Petrucelli Nancie, Lazebnik Noam, Huelsman Karen M, Lazebnik Roee S
Department of Medical Genetics, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Genet Test. 2002 Summer;6(2):107-13. doi: 10.1089/10906570260199357.
The intent of this study was to document current practices in breast cancer genetic counseling and identify areas of variability for patients with a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene. Registered members of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) Cancer Special Interest Group (SIG) were sent an invitation via electronic mail to participate in an online questionnaire. The questionnaire was divided into three sections: clinical experience, clinical meaning, and risk perceptions and clinical recommendations for clinical situations involving a VUS. Fifty-seven of the eligible members responded. During the pre-test counseling session for a BRCA risk assessment patient, the vast majority of counselors (80.7%) mention VUS as a possible test result. Nearly half, 49.1%, report having given such a result to their patients at least one to four times. However, only 63.2% felt as though their patients understood the meaning of a VUS result. When asked to conclude the implication of a VUS and make medical management recommendations, the responses were varied. Nevertheless, a good proportion of counselors expressed the importance of testing other family members to help clarify the proband's risk and aid in medical management issues. Although the recent recommendations by the American College of Medical Genetics suggest standards for the interpretation of sequence variations, they do not provide guidelines for making clinical recommendations based on these variations. The results of this study reveal significant diversity in the personal interpretation of a VUS result, leading to various clinical recommendations, and suggest a need for clinical management recommendations as well.
本研究的目的是记录乳腺癌遗传咨询的当前实践情况,并确定在BRCA1或BRCA2基因中存在意义未明变异(VUS)的患者的变异区域。通过电子邮件向美国国家遗传咨询师协会(NSGC)癌症特别兴趣小组(SIG)的注册成员发出了参与在线问卷的邀请。问卷分为三个部分:临床经验、临床意义以及对涉及VUS的临床情况的风险认知和临床建议。57名符合条件的成员进行了回复。在为一名BRCA风险评估患者进行的预测试咨询环节中,绝大多数咨询师(80.7%)提到VUS是一种可能的检测结果。近一半(49.1%)的咨询师报告称至少一至四次向患者给出过这样的结果。然而,只有63.2%的咨询师认为他们的患者理解VUS结果的含义。当被要求总结VUS的含义并提出医疗管理建议时,回答各不相同。尽管如此,相当一部分咨询师表示检测其他家庭成员对于帮助明确先证者的风险以及辅助医疗管理问题的重要性。虽然美国医学遗传学学会最近的建议提出了序列变异解读的标准,但并未提供基于这些变异做出临床建议的指南。本研究结果揭示了VUS结果个人解读方面的显著差异,导致了各种临床建议,并表明也需要临床管理建议。