• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Molecular analyses of the principal components of response strength.反应强度主要成分的分子分析。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Sep;78(2):127-60. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.78-127.
2
The principal components of response strength.反应强度的主要成分。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 Mar;75(2):111-34. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-111.
3
The effects of motivation on response rate: a hidden semi-Markov model analysis of behavioral dynamics.动机对反应率的影响:行为动态的隐半马尔可夫模型分析。
J Neurosci Methods. 2011 Sep 30;201(1):251-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.06.028. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
4
Behavioral economics and within-session changes in responding.行为经济学与反应过程中的会话内变化
J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Nov;72(3):355-71. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1999.72-355.
5
Response elimination, reinforcement rate and resurgence of operant behavior.操作性行为的反应消除、强化率与恢复
Behav Processes. 2013 Nov;100:91-102. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.07.027. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
6
Frequency of reinforcement as a determinant of extinction-induced aggression during errorless discrimination learning.在无错误辨别学习过程中,强化频率作为消退诱导攻击行为的一个决定因素。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Jan;23(1):121-9. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.23-121.
7
Extinguished operant responding shows stimulus specificity.消退的操作性反应表现出刺激特异性。
Behav Processes. 2004 Mar 31;65(3):211-20. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2003.10.001.
8
Within-session changes in responding during concurrent schedules with different reinforcers in the components.在各成分中使用不同强化物的并发程序安排期间反应的时段内变化。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Nov;66(3):369-90. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.66-369.
9
Are associative changes in acquisition and extinction negatively accelerated?习得和消退中的联合性变化是否呈负加速?
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2001 Oct;27(4):307-15.
10
Effects of delayed reinforcers on the behavior of an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).延迟强化物对注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)动物模型行为的影响。
Behav Brain Res. 2005 Jul 1;162(1):47-61. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.02.034. Epub 2005 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Bouts, Pauses, and Units of Operant Performance: A Primer.操作性行为表现的发作、停顿与单元:入门指南
Perspect Behav Sci. 2024 Aug 30;47(3):643-674. doi: 10.1007/s40614-024-00419-z. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
The temporal structure of goal-directed and habitual operant behavior.目标导向和习惯性操作性行为的时间结构。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2024 Jan;121(1):38-51. doi: 10.1002/jeab.896. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
3
Pupillary dynamics of mice performing a Pavlovian delay conditioning task reflect reward-predictive signals.执行巴甫洛夫延迟条件反射任务的小鼠的瞳孔动态反映了奖励预测信号。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2022 Dec 8;16:1045764. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.1045764. eCollection 2022.
4
Longer operant lever-press duration requirements induce fewer but longer response bouts in rats.较长的操作性压杆时长要求会导致大鼠的反应次数减少,但每次反应持续时间更长。
Learn Behav. 2021 Sep;49(3):330-342. doi: 10.3758/s13420-021-00464-7. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
5
Internal-Clock Models and Misguided Views of Mechanistic Explanations: A Reply to Eckard & Lattal (2020).生物钟模型与对机制性解释的错误观点:对埃卡德和拉塔尔(2020年)的回应
Perspect Behav Sci. 2020 Sep 11;43(4):779-790. doi: 10.1007/s40614-020-00268-6. eCollection 2020 Dec.
6
Simulating bout-and-pause patterns with reinforcement learning.使用强化学习模拟回合-暂停模式。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 12;15(11):e0242201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242201. eCollection 2020.
7
Human free-operant performance varies with a concurrent task: Probability learning without a task, and schedule-consistent with a task.人类的自由操作行为会因一项并发任务而有所不同:无任务时的概率学习,以及与任务一致的时间表。
Learn Behav. 2020 Jun;48(2):254-273. doi: 10.3758/s13420-019-00398-1.
8
A computational formulation of the behavior systems account of the temporal organization of motivated behavior.动机行为时间组织的行为系统理论的一种计算表述。
Behav Processes. 2019 Dec;169:103952. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.103952. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
9
Toward the Unification of Molecular and Molar Analyses.迈向分子分析与摩尔分析的统一
Behav Anal. 2013 Fall;36(2):295-312. doi: 10.1007/BF03392316.
10
Interval timing under a behavioral microscope: Dissociating motivational and timing processes in fixed-interval performance.行为显微镜下的间隔计时:区分固定间隔表现中的动机和计时过程。
Learn Behav. 2017 Mar;45(1):29-48. doi: 10.3758/s13420-016-0234-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Averaging Effects In The Study Of Fixed-ratio Response Patterns.固定比率反应模式研究中的平均效应
J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Mar;71(2):145-53. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1999.71-145.
2
The conventional wisdom of behavior analysis.行为分析的传统观念。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Sep;60(2):439-47. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-439.
3
Choice in transition: A comparison of melioration and the kinetic model.选择的转变:改善和动力学模型的比较。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Mar;49(2):291-302. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-291.
4
Spatiotemporal patterns of behavior produced by variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.由可变间隔强化时间表产生的行为的时空模式。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Sep;44(2):217-31. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-217.
5
The microanalysis of fixed-interval responding.固定间隔反应的微分析。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Mar;39(2):327-43. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-327.
6
Fixed-ratio performance with and without a postreinforcement timeout.有和没有强化后时滞的固定比例表现。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Sep;38(2):143-55. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-143.
7
Formal properties of the matching law.匹配律的形式性质。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jan;21(1):159-64. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-159.
8
On the law of effect.关于效果律。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243-66. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243.
9
What is the experimental analysis of behavior?什么是行为的实验分析?
J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 May;9(3):213-8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-213.
10
Interresponse time as a function of continuous variables: a new method and some data.作为连续变量函数的反应间期:一种新方法及一些数据。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6(2):237-46. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-237.

反应强度主要成分的分子分析。

Molecular analyses of the principal components of response strength.

作者信息

Killeen Peter R, Hall Scott S, Reilly Mark P, Kettle Lauren C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe 85287-1104, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Sep;78(2):127-60. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.78-127.

DOI:10.1901/jeab.2002.78-127
PMID:12216975
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1284892/
Abstract

Killeen and Hall (2001) showed that a common factor called strength underlies the key dependent variables of response probability, latency, and rate, and that overall response rate is a good predictor of strength. In a search for the mechanisms that underlie those correlations, this article shows that (a) the probability of responding on a trial is a two-state Markov process; (b) latency and rate of responding can be described in terms of the probability and period of stochastic machines called clocked Bernoulli modules, and (c) one such machine, the refractory Poisson process, provides a functional relation between the probability of observing a response during any epoch and the rate of responding. This relation is one of proportionality at low rates and curvilinearity at higher rates.

摘要

基林和霍尔(2001年)指出,一个名为强度的共同因素是反应概率、潜伏期和速率等关键因变量的基础,并且总体反应速率是强度的良好预测指标。在探寻这些相关性背后的机制时,本文表明:(a)一次试验中做出反应的概率是一个二态马尔可夫过程;(b)反应潜伏期和速率可以根据被称为定时伯努利模块的随机机器的概率和周期来描述;(c)其中一种这样的机器,即不应期泊松过程,在任何时间段内观察到反应的概率与反应速率之间提供了一种函数关系。这种关系在低速率时是比例关系,在高速率时是曲线关系。