Huber Thomas S, Ozaki C Keith, Flynn Timothy C, Lee W Anthony, Berceli Scott A, Hirneise Christa M, Carlton Lori M, Carter Jeffrey W, Ross Edward A, Seeger James M
Department of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, USA.
J Vasc Surg. 2002 Sep;36(3):452-9. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.127342.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate an algorithm to maximize native arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) for hemodialysis access.
The prospective study design was set in an academic, tertiary care medical center. The study subjects were adults referred for permanent, upper extremity hemodialysis access between April 1999 and May 2001. Intervention included Doppler arterial pressures/waveforms and duplex imaging of the basilic, cephalic, and central veins. The optimal configuration for an AVF was determined (criteria: vein >3 mm, no arterial inflow stenosis, no venous outflow stenosis) on the basis of the noninvasive studies, and unilateral arteriography/venography was performed to confirm the choice. Permanent hemodialysis access was created on the basis of the imaging studies, and remedial imaging/intervention was performed if the AVF failed to mature. Outcome measures included impact of the noninvasive/invasive imaging, perioperative morbidity/mortality, incidence of successful AVF, time to cannulation, and predictors of AVF failure with multivariate analysis.
A total of 139 new access procedures was performed in 131 patients (age, 53 +/- 16 years; male, 51%; white, 60%; diabetic, 49%; actively undergoing dialysis, 50%; prior permanent access, 26%). The noninvasive imaging showed that 83% of the patients were candidates for AVF, with a mean of 2.7 +/- 2.1 possible configurations. Invasive imaging was abnormal in 38% (forearm arterial disease > central vein stenosis > inflow stenosis) and impacted the operative plan in 19%. AVF were performed in 90% of the cases (brachiobasilic > brachiocephalic > radiocephalic > radiobasilic), with prosthetic AVF performed primarily because of inadequate veins. Among the patients who underwent AVF, the 30-day mortality rate was 1%, the complication rate was 20% (wound, 10%; hand ischemia, 8%), and 24% needed a remedial procedure. The AVF matured sufficiently for cannulation in 84% of those with sufficient follow-up and was suitable for cannulation by 3.4 +/- 1.8 months. On the basis of an intention to treat approach, an AVF sufficient for cannulation developed in 71% of the 139 cases referred for access. The multivariate analysis predicted that female gender (odds ratio, 9.7; 95% CI, 2.2 to 43.5) and the radiocephalic configuration (odds ratio, 4.6; 95% CI, 1.1 to 18.6) were both independent predictors of failure of the fistula to mature.
With the aggressive algorithm, the construction of native AVF is possible in the overwhelming majority of patients presenting for new hemodialysis access.
本研究旨在评估一种算法,以最大限度地利用自体动静脉内瘘(AVF)进行血液透析通路。
前瞻性研究设计在一家学术性三级医疗中心进行。研究对象为1999年4月至2001年5月期间因永久性上肢血液透析通路而转诊的成年人。干预措施包括多普勒动脉压/波形以及对贵要静脉、头静脉和中心静脉的双功超声成像。根据无创检查确定AVF的最佳配置(标准:静脉>3mm,无动脉流入狭窄,无静脉流出狭窄),并进行单侧动脉造影/静脉造影以确认选择。根据影像学检查建立永久性血液透析通路,如果AVF未能成熟,则进行补救性影像学检查/干预。观察指标包括无创/有创影像学检查的影响、围手术期发病率/死亡率、成功建立AVF的发生率、开始穿刺的时间以及通过多变量分析确定的AVF失败的预测因素。
131例患者共进行了139次新的通路建立手术(年龄53±16岁;男性51%;白人60%;糖尿病患者49%;正在积极进行透析的患者50%;既往有永久性通路的患者26%)。无创影像学检查显示,83%的患者适合建立AVF,平均有2.7±2.1种可能的配置。有创影像学检查异常的占38%(前臂动脉疾病>中心静脉狭窄>流入狭窄),并影响了19%的手术方案。90%的病例建立了AVF(肱动脉-贵要静脉>肱动脉-头静脉>桡动脉-头静脉>桡动脉-贵要静脉),主要因静脉条件不佳而进行了人工血管AVF。在接受AVF的患者中,30天死亡率为1%,并发症发生率为20%(伤口10%;手部缺血8%),24%的患者需要进行补救手术。在有足够随访时间的患者中,84%的AVF成熟到足以进行穿刺,平均在3.4±1.8个月时适合穿刺。基于意向性治疗方法,在139例转诊建立通路的病例中,71%的患者建立了足以进行穿刺的AVF。多变量分析预测,女性(优势比9.7;95%可信区间2.2至43.5)和桡动脉-头静脉配置(优势比4.6;95%可信区间1.1至18.6)均是内瘘未能成熟的独立预测因素。
采用积极的算法,绝大多数新的血液透析通路患者能够建立自体AVF。