Bernt William, Polosukhina Katherine, Weiner Bruce, Tscharnuter Walther, Highsmith Stefan
Department of Biochemistry, University of the Pacific School of Dentistry, San Francisco, California 94115-2399, USA.
Biochemistry. 2002 Sep 17;41(37):11308-14. doi: 10.1021/bi0202979.
The electrical properties of contractile proteins contribute to muscle structure and perhaps function but have not been characterized adequately. Electrophoretic mobility, mu(e), is sensitive to the net electric charge and hydrodynamic size of a molecule in solution. Zeta potential, zeta, particle charge, Q(e), and particle charge-to-mass ratio are proportional to mu(e). We measured mu(e) for nucleotide complexes of skeletal muscle heavy meromyosin (HMM) and subfragment 1 (S1). The results indicate that mu(e) for HMM changes depending on the ligand bound in the active site. The changes in electric charge appear to occur mainly on the S1 moieties. For HMM(MgATPgammaS)(2) and HMM(MgADP.P(i))(2) the values of mu(e) are -0.077 and -0.17 (microm/s)/(V/cm), respectively. For these complexes, mu(e) is independent of [ATP], [ADP], and [P(i)]. When P(i) dissociates from HMM(MgADP.P(i))(2) to form HMM(MgADP)(2), mu(e) decreases to -0.61 (microm/s)/(V/cm). This large decrease in mu(e) is independent of free [ADP] or [ATP]. Increasing [P(i)], on the other hand, increases mu(e) for HMM(MgADP)(2) to values near those observed for the steady-state intermediate. For HMM, mu(e) = -0.34 and is independent of P(i). MgADP binding to HMM decreases mu(e) to -0.57 (microm/s)/(V/cm), and the dissociation constant is 9 microM. Taken together, these data indicate that mu(e) and, thus, zeta are controlled by ligand binding to the active site. The magnitudes of the particle charge-to-mass ratios for the HMM complexes are all in a range that falls within published values determined for a variety of other proteins. Possible roles that the observed nucleotide-dependent changes in cross-bridge electric charge might have in the contractile cycle in muscle are considered.
收缩蛋白的电学性质对肌肉结构乃至功能都有贡献,但尚未得到充分表征。电泳迁移率(μ(e))对溶液中分子的净电荷和流体动力学大小敏感。ζ电位(ζ)、粒子电荷(Q(e))以及粒子电荷质量比与μ(e)成正比。我们测量了骨骼肌重酶解肌球蛋白(HMM)和亚片段1(S1)的核苷酸复合物的μ(e)。结果表明,HMM的μ(e)会根据结合在活性位点的配体而变化。电荷变化似乎主要发生在S1部分。对于HMM(MgATPγS)₂和HMM(MgADP·P(i))₂,μ(e)的值分别为-0.077和-0.17(μm/s)/(V/cm)。对于这些复合物,μ(e)与[ATP]、[ADP]和[P(i)]无关。当P(i)从HMM(MgADP·P(i))₂解离形成HMM(MgADP)₂时,μ(e)降至-0.61(μm/s)/(V/cm)。μ(e)的这种大幅下降与游离的[ADP]或[ATP]无关。另一方面,增加[P(i)]会使HMM(MgADP)₂的μ(e)增加到接近稳态中间体所观察到的值。对于HMM,μ(e)= -0.34且与P(i)无关。MgADP与HMM结合会使μ(e)降至-0.57(μm/s)/(V/cm),解离常数为9μM。综上所述,这些数据表明μ(e)以及ζ受配体与活性位点的结合控制。HMM复合物的粒子电荷质量比的大小均在已公布的多种其他蛋白质所确定的值范围内。我们考虑了观察到的跨桥电荷的核苷酸依赖性变化在肌肉收缩循环中可能具有的作用。