Rappolt Susan, Tassone Maria
Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, 256 McCaul Street, Toronto, ON M5T 1W5.
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2002 Summer;22(3):170-80. doi: 10.1002/chp.1340220306.
Rehabilitation therapists are strongly encouraged to apply research to their practices, but relatively little is known about the processes therapists use for continuing their education. This study examines the strategies used by a sample of therapists to gather new knowledge, evaluate its appropriateness to their clinical problems, and implement new learning into their practices.
Twenty-four randomly selected occupational therapists and physical therapists from a large metropolitan area participated in in-depth interviews. Descriptive codes within interview transcripts described participants' individual approaches to continuing education (CE). Themes derived from comparative analysis across interviews were interpreted, building on prior understandings and suggesting strategies for CE research and programs.
Participants valued formal CE highly and expressed frustration concerning its limited availability. Most participants relied on informal consultations with peers as their first educational resource. Peers also supported participants' evaluation and implementation of new knowledge. Although seven participants reported use of systematic methods to access, evaluate, and implement new knowledge, others described more haphazard approaches toward evaluation and application of their learning. Participants identified economic, administrative, and interprofessional barriers to integration of new knowledge into their practices.
There is a need to develop and incorporate guidelines for evaluating and implementing learning within formal and informal CE programs. The appeal of formal CE suggests that more efficient strategies for continuing rehabilitation are required. Therapists' heavy reliance on peers suggests that educationally influential therapists may be effective media for informal CE interventions. CE targeted to policy makers should focus on promoting organizational change to enhance therapists' translation of research into practice.
强烈鼓励康复治疗师将研究应用于实践,但对于治疗师继续教育所采用的过程却知之甚少。本研究考察了一组治疗师用于获取新知识、评估其对临床问题的适用性以及将新学到的知识应用于实践的策略。
从一个大城市随机选取了24名职业治疗师和物理治疗师参与深入访谈。访谈记录中的描述性编码描述了参与者继续教育(CE)的个人方法。基于先前的理解,对跨访谈的比较分析得出的主题进行了解释,并提出了CE研究和项目的策略。
参与者高度重视正规的CE,并对其可用性有限表示不满。大多数参与者将与同行的非正式咨询作为首要教育资源。同行也支持参与者对新知识的评估和应用。虽然有7名参与者报告使用系统方法获取、评估和应用新知识,但其他人描述了在评估和应用所学知识时采用的更为随意的方法。参与者指出了将新知识融入实践的经济、行政和跨专业障碍。
需要制定并纳入在正规和非正规CE项目中评估和应用所学知识的指导方针。正规CE的吸引力表明需要更有效的康复继续教育策略。治疗师对同行的严重依赖表明,在教育方面有影响力的治疗师可能是进行非正规CE干预的有效媒介。针对政策制定者的CE应侧重于促进组织变革,以增强治疗师将研究转化为实践的能力。