• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消除固定成本:第一部分——卫生系统驱动因素

Eliminating fixed costs: Part I--Health system drivers.

作者信息

Weil Thomas P

出版信息

Manag Care Interface. 2002 Aug;15(8):27-32, 53.

PMID:12229063
Abstract

Americans want less-bureaucratic, higher-quality, and above all, less-costly health care. Reducing the number of nurses, pharmacists, and others who care for patients is not a viable solution; fiscal constraints, which reduce fixed costs, are superior to other options in containing health costs. To this end, it is imperative that the U.S. reimbursement system be simplified. Posing as a major encumbrance are some deeply vested, highly placed self-interests that obstruct implementation of a partly private, partly public reimbursement system that would better serve patients, providers, and insurers. In part I of this two-part article, the author describes some of the drivers that are pushing health care costs to higher levels.

摘要

美国人希望获得官僚作风更少、质量更高,尤其是成本更低的医疗保健服务。减少护士、药剂师及其他护理患者人员的数量并非可行的解决方案;削减固定成本的财政限制在控制医疗成本方面比其他选择更具优势。为此,简化美国的报销系统势在必行。一些根深蒂固、位高权重的既得利益者构成了主要障碍,他们阻碍了部分私立、部分公立报销系统的实施,而这样的系统能更好地服务患者、医疗服务提供者和保险公司。在这篇分两部分的文章的第一部分中,作者描述了一些推动医疗成本上升的因素。

相似文献

1
Eliminating fixed costs: Part I--Health system drivers.消除固定成本:第一部分——卫生系统驱动因素
Manag Care Interface. 2002 Aug;15(8):27-32, 53.
2
Diametrically opposed.截然相反。
Mod Healthc. 2011 May 16;41(20):6-7, 16, 1.
3
Medicaid managed care and the distribution of societal costs for persons with severe mental illness.医疗补助管理式医疗与严重精神疾病患者的社会成本分配
Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;165(2):254-60. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06122089. Epub 2008 Jan 15.
4
More dollars for doctors?给医生更多报酬?
Med Econ. 1998 Nov 23;75(23):38, 41.
5
How managed care could coopt the public sector.管理式医疗如何拉拢公共部门。
Med Interface. 1997 Feb;10(2):68-72, 75, 78 passim.
6
Medicaid managed care: can health plans survive on the government's payments?医疗补助管理式医疗:健康计划能否靠政府支付生存?
Med Interface. 1994 Mar;7(3):131-4.
7
Lower than expected. Health care costs: a Michigan success story.低于预期。医疗保健成本:密歇根州的成功案例。
Mich Health Hosp. 1996 Jan-Feb;32(1):30-2.
8
Health care reform ... unprecedented shift to managed care.医疗保健改革……向管理式医疗的前所未有的转变。
State Health Care Am. 1995:8-13.
9
Health care spending: can the United States control it?医疗保健支出:美国能控制住吗?
Baxter Health Policy Rev. 1996;2:1-32.
10
Managed care: practice, pitfalls, and potential.管理式医疗:实践、陷阱与潜力。
Health Care Financ Rev Annu Suppl. 1991:27-34.