Reich Sven, Hornberger Helga
Faculty of Medicine, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.
J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Jul;88(1):44-9.
Computer-aided design/computer-assisted machining systems offer the possibility of fabricating restorations from one machinable ceramic block. Whether multishaded blocks improve esthetic results and are a viable alternative to individually stained ceramics has not been fully determined.
The aim of this investigation was to examine the effect of multishaded blocks on the esthetic appearance of all-ceramic CEREC crowns and compare these crowns with single-shade and stained restorations.
Ten subjects were included in this study. For each subject, 6 different crowns were milled with the use of a CEREC machine. One crown was milled from each of the following machinable ceramic materials: CEREC Vitablocs Mark II in classic colors; Vitablocs Mark II in 3D-Master colors; Vitablocs Mark II in either classic or 3D-Master colors, with additional staining; Megadenta Bloxx multishaded; Mark II experimental multilayer; and an experimental multilayer leucite ceramic. Three independent examiners assessed the esthetic appearance of crowns fabricated to match each subject's anterior tooth shade. A scale of 1 to 6 was used to score the shade match and esthetic adaptation of each crown, with 1 representing excellent characteristics and 3.5 serving as the threshold for clinical acceptability. The examiners' scores were averaged, and the mean values were analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed rank test (P<or=.05).
Only individually stained Mark II restorations achieved a mean score below the threshold of 3.5 for all 10 subjects. These restorations were significantly more esthetic (P<or=.05) than restorations fabricated from all other materials except the Mark II experimental multilayer ceramic. The second best results were obtained for crowns made from single-shaded Mark II 3D-Master blocks: 6 out of 10 restorations were scored below 3.5. Two of the layered materials (Mark II experimental and Bloxx) followed with 5 acceptable restorations out of 10.
Within the limitations of this study, the results provide no evidence that multicolored machinable ceramics improve the esthetics of all-ceramic crowns.
计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助加工系统提供了用一种可加工陶瓷块制作修复体的可能性。多色块是否能改善美学效果以及是否是单独染色陶瓷的可行替代方案尚未完全确定。
本研究的目的是研究多色块对全瓷CEREC冠美学外观的影响,并将这些冠与单色和染色修复体进行比较。
本研究纳入了10名受试者。对于每名受试者,使用CEREC机器制作6种不同的冠。分别从以下可加工陶瓷材料中制作一个冠:经典颜色的CEREC Vitablocs Mark II;3D-Master颜色的Vitablocs Mark II;经典或3D-Master颜色的Vitablocs Mark II并额外染色;Megadenta Bloxx多色块;Mark II实验性多层材料;以及一种实验性多层白榴石陶瓷。三名独立的检查者评估制作成与每名受试者前牙颜色匹配的冠的美学外观。使用1至6分的量表对每个冠的颜色匹配和美学适应性进行评分,1分代表优异特征,3.5分为临床可接受性阈值。对检查者的评分进行平均,并使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验分析平均值(P≤0.05)。
只有单独染色的Mark II修复体在所有10名受试者中平均得分低于3.5的阈值。除Mark II实验性多层陶瓷外,这些修复体的美学效果明显优于所有其他材料制作的修复体(P≤0.05)。由单色Mark II 3D-Master块制作的冠获得了第二好的结果:10个修复体中有6个得分低于3.5。两种分层材料(Mark II实验性材料和Bloxx)紧随其后,10个修复体中有5个可接受。
在本研究的局限性内,结果没有提供证据表明多色可加工陶瓷能改善全瓷冠的美学效果。