Kansal Nikhil, LoGerfo Frank W, Belfield Alana K, Pomposelli Frank B, Hamdan Allen D, Angle Niren, Campbell David R, Sridhar Abiram, Freischlag Julie A, Quiñones-Baldrich William
Division of Vascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2002 Sep;16(5):591-6. doi: 10.1007/s10016-001-0281-7. Epub 2002 Sep 23.
Mesenteric artery bypass originating from the supraceliac aorta (antegrade bypass) has been the standard orientation of visceral artery bypass grafts. Retrograde bypass, in which the bypass originates from the iliac arteries, has not been as widely accepted. The purpose of our study was to compare the results of these two types of bypass in a similar population. We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients undergoing mesenteric artery bypass at two tertiary care medical centers (UCLA Medical Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center). Between February 1992 and January 2001, 37 patients underwent 39 mesenteric bypass procedures. The choice of bypass orientation (antegrade versus retrograde) was determined by the individual surgeon. Chart review, duplex ultrasonography, and/or telephone interviews were used to assess symptom-free survival. Actuarial analysis was completed using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. From this assessment we were able to determine that symptom-free survival of patients undergoing retrograde mesenteric bypass is similar to that seen in antegrade bypass. Primary retrograde bypass is a valid option for patients undergoing mesenteric bypass.
源自腹腔干上方主动脉的肠系膜动脉搭桥术(顺行搭桥)一直是内脏动脉搭桥移植的标准术式。而源自髂动脉的逆行搭桥术,其接受程度则没那么广泛。我们研究的目的是在相似人群中比较这两种搭桥术的效果。我们回顾性分析了两家三级医疗中心(加州大学洛杉矶分校医疗中心、贝斯以色列女执事医疗中心)接受肠系膜动脉搭桥术患者的记录。在1992年2月至2001年1月期间,37例患者接受了39次肠系膜搭桥手术。搭桥方向(顺行与逆行)的选择由主刀医生决定。通过查阅病历、双功超声检查和/或电话访谈来评估无症状生存期。使用Kaplan-Meier生存估计法完成精算分析。通过该评估我们能够确定,接受逆行肠系膜搭桥术患者的无症状生存期与顺行搭桥术患者相似。对于接受肠系膜搭桥术的患者,原发性逆行搭桥是一种有效的选择。