Suppr超能文献

硫唑嘌呤或甲氨蝶呤治疗激素依赖型或激素抵抗型溃疡性结肠炎患者:一项关于诱导和维持缓解的疗效及耐受性的开放标签研究结果

Azathioprine or methotrexate in the treatment of patients with steroid-dependent or steroid-resistant ulcerative colitis: results of an open-label study on efficacy and tolerability in inducing and maintaining remission.

作者信息

Paoluzi O A, Pica R, Marcheggiano A, Crispino P, Iacopini F, Iannoni C, Rivera M, Paoluzi P

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences, Gastroenterology Unit, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002 Oct;16(10):1751-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2002.01340.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of azathioprine and methotrexate in inducing and maintaining remission in patients with ulcerative colitis is still controversial.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of these two drugs in a series of patients with steroid-dependent or steroid-resistant active ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

Forty-two patients were treated with a daily dose of azathioprine (2 mg/kg) and, if intolerant or not responding, with methotrexate (12.5 mg/week intramuscularly), and their efficacy was established by clinical, endoscopic and histological examinations at 6 months. Patients achieving clinical remission continued with treatment and were followed up.

RESULTS

Of the 42 patients on azathioprine, 10 experienced early side-effects requiring withdrawal from treatment, 22 (69%) achieved complete remission, six (19%) achieved improvement and four (12%) obtained no substantial benefit. Methotrexate, administered to eight patients intolerant to and two patients resistant to azathioprine, induced complete remission in six patients (60%) and improvement in four (40%). During follow-up, a larger number of patients on azathioprine relapsed in comparison with patients on methotrexate [16/28 (57%) vs. 2/10 (20%), respectively; P < 0.05]. Only minor side-effects were observed on both treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Azathioprine is effective in patients with steroid-dependent or steroid-resistant ulcerative colitis. Methotrexate seems to be a good alternative in patients intolerant to or not responding to azathioprine.

摘要

背景

硫唑嘌呤和甲氨蝶呤在诱导和维持溃疡性结肠炎患者缓解方面的作用仍存在争议。

目的

评估这两种药物对一系列激素依赖型或激素抵抗型活动性溃疡性结肠炎患者的疗效和耐受性。

方法

42例患者每日服用硫唑嘌呤(2mg/kg),若不耐受或无反应,则改为甲氨蝶呤(每周12.5mg肌肉注射),6个月时通过临床、内镜和组织学检查确定其疗效。达到临床缓解的患者继续治疗并进行随访。

结果

42例服用硫唑嘌呤的患者中,10例出现早期副作用需停药,22例(69%)完全缓解,6例(19%)病情改善,4例(12%)未获明显益处。8例硫唑嘌呤不耐受患者和2例硫唑嘌呤抵抗患者改用甲氨蝶呤治疗,6例(60%)完全缓解,4例(40%)病情改善。随访期间,服用硫唑嘌呤的患者复发人数多于服用甲氨蝶呤的患者[分别为16/28(57%)和2/10(20%);P<0.05]。两种治疗均仅观察到轻微副作用。

结论

硫唑嘌呤对激素依赖型或激素抵抗型溃疡性结肠炎患者有效。甲氨蝶呤似乎是硫唑嘌呤不耐受或无反应患者的良好替代药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验