Suppr超能文献

甲氨蝶呤治疗炎症性肠病的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析

Efficacy and safety of methotrexate in the management of inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.

作者信息

Nielsen Ole Haagen, Steenholdt Casper, Juhl Carsten Bogh, Rogler Gerhard

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Research Unit for Musculoskeletal Function and Physiotherapy, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Feb 4;20:100271. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100271. eCollection 2020 Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic role of methotrexate (MTX) for management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains unclear.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) of MTX for induction and maintenance of remission in IBD until January 2020 in accordance with PROSPERO protocol (#CRD42018115047). Relative risk (RR) of maintenance of remission, induction of remission, endoscopic disease activity, and adverse events were combined in a meta-analysis.

FINDINGS

MTX monotherapy was not superior to placebo for induction of clinical remission in Crohn's disease (CD). However, MTX was superior to placebo in maintaining clinical remission of CD. Concomitant therapy with MTX and the TNF inhibitor infliximab (IFX) was not superior to IFX monotherapy in CD. In ulcerative colitis (UC), MTX monotherapy was not superior to placebo neither for induction of clinical remission, nor for maintenance of clinical remission. MTX did not result in superior endoscopic outcomes during induction or maintenance therapy compared with placebo. Regarding adverse events (AEs), our meta-analysis on CD studies showed a significantly higher risk of AEs when comparing MTX versus placebo in studies investigating induction of remission, but not in maintenance of remission. In UC, no such differences in AEs between MTX or placebo were observed.

INTERPRETATION

Current data support the efficacy of parenteral MTX monotherapy for maintenance of clinical remission in CD. MTX is not confirmed to be effective for treatment of UC or for induction of remission in CD. No evidence supports concomitant MTX to improve efficacy of IFX (no other biologics investigated).

摘要

背景

甲氨蝶呤(MTX)在炎症性肠病(IBD)治疗中的作用仍不明确。

方法

我们按照PROSPERO方案(#CRD42018115047)系统回顾了截至2020年1月MTX用于诱导和维持IBD缓解的随机对照试验(RCT)。在一项荟萃分析中综合了缓解维持、缓解诱导、内镜疾病活动度和不良事件的相对风险(RR)。

结果

MTX单药治疗在诱导克罗恩病(CD)临床缓解方面并不优于安慰剂。然而,MTX在维持CD临床缓解方面优于安慰剂。MTX与肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂英夫利昔单抗(IFX)联合治疗在CD中并不优于IFX单药治疗。在溃疡性结肠炎(UC)中,MTX单药治疗在诱导临床缓解和维持临床缓解方面均不优于安慰剂。与安慰剂相比,MTX在诱导或维持治疗期间未产生更好的内镜检查结果。关于不良事件(AE),我们对CD研究的荟萃分析显示,在研究缓解诱导的试验中,比较MTX与安慰剂时AE风险显著更高,但在缓解维持试验中并非如此。在UC中,未观察到MTX与安慰剂之间在AE方面存在此类差异。

解读

目前的数据支持肠外MTX单药治疗在维持CD临床缓解方面的疗效。MTX未被证实对UC治疗或CD缓解诱导有效。没有证据支持联合使用MTX可提高IFX的疗效(未研究其他生物制剂)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0718/7152823/1e484c1e1a3b/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验