Andre T, Dietsch C, Cheng Y
Contemp Educ Psychol. 1991 Jul;16(3):215-40. doi: 10.1016/0361-476x(91)90022-d.
Previous studies of the sources of sex education are reviewed and critically analyzed. Most previous studies have examined the limited issue of which source of sex education is most important, examined the sources of only a few sexual topics, or used inadequate methodology. In the present study, more adequate data regarding the relative contributions of parents, schools, reading, and peers to information about each of 35 different sexual topics were obtained from a sample of 232 male and female, coitally experienced or inexperienced, midwestern college students. Individual reading and peers were the highest rated sources overall and on most of the subcategories of items. Schools were highly rated sources for topics related to the anatomy and physiology of sex and venereal disease. Coitally experienced (CE) individuals reported receiving more information overall than coitally inexperienced (CIE) individuals. However, contrary to previous speculations, CE and CIE individuals did not differ in the amount of information received from parents. Instead, CE individuals received more information through reading and from peers than did CIE individuals. Consistent with previous findings, amount of information received from parents correlated negatively with performance on a sexual knowledge test. Comparison of the present results with previous research suggested a developmental hypothesis, namely, that as individuals develop from early adolescence to young adulthood and become more sexually active, individual reading becomes a more important source of sexual information.
回顾并批判性地分析了以往关于性教育来源的研究。以往的大多数研究都只探讨了性教育最重要的来源这一有限问题,只研究了少数几个性话题的来源,或者采用了不充分的方法。在本研究中,从232名有或没有性经历的中西部男女大学生样本中,获得了关于父母、学校、阅读和同龄人对35个不同性话题信息的相对贡献的更充分数据。总体而言,个人阅读和同龄人在所有项目以及大多数子类别中都是评分最高的来源。学校在与性解剖学和生理学以及性病相关的话题上是评分较高的来源。有性经历(CE)的个体报告称,总体上比无性经历(CIE)的个体获得了更多信息。然而,与之前的推测相反,有性经历和无性经历的个体从父母那里获得的信息量没有差异。相反,有性经历的个体通过阅读和从同龄人那里获得的信息比无性经历的个体更多。与之前的研究结果一致,从父母那里获得的信息量与性知识测试成绩呈负相关。将本研究结果与之前的研究进行比较,提出了一个发展假说,即随着个体从青春期早期发展到青年期并变得更加性活跃,个人阅读成为性信息的一个更重要来源。