Ranguelov Rostislav D, Rosenthal Nancy, Bromley Christine, Vasef Mohammad A
Department of Pathology, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242, USA.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002 Oct;126(10):1193-6. doi: 10.5858/2002-126-1193-DOFVLA.
Individuals with factor V or prothrombin gene mutations are at increased risk for thrombotic events. Furthermore, the risk of recurrent deep venous thrombosis in heterozygous carriers of both factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene mutations is high enough that some investigators suggest lifelong warfarin prophylaxis for these individuals, even with a single spontaneous thrombotic event.
To assess the incidence of factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene mutations in an autopsy population and to determine if these tests can prove useful in identification of at-risk family members.
We analyzed factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene mutations in 45 patients who died with or of thrombotic events, using archival tissue and multiplex allele-specific polymerase chain reaction amplification. The wild-type factor V gene was amplified in all 45 patients, whereas the wild-type prothrombin gene was amplified in 29 patients.
Two patients (4.4%) who died with thrombotic events at the ages of 35 and 92 years were heterozygous for factor V gene mutation. Two additional patients (6.7%), who died with thrombotic events at the ages of 26 and 39 years, were heterozygous for prothrombin gene mutation. Patients homozygous for either factor V or prothrombin gene or simultaneously heterozygous for both genes were not detected in our study.
Our findings suggest that screening the relatives of elderly patients who die with thrombotic events would not be cost-effective because of the low incidence of these mutations in the autopsy population. However, because the incidence of these mutations appeared significantly more frequently among individuals who died at 39 years or younger, testing the relatives of this subset of patients may prove useful for detection of at-risk individuals who would benefit from preventive anticoagulation therapy.
携带因子V或凝血酶原基因突变的个体发生血栓事件的风险增加。此外,同时携带因子V莱顿突变和凝血酶原基因突变的杂合子携带者发生复发性深静脉血栓形成的风险足够高,以至于一些研究人员建议对这些个体进行终身华法林预防性治疗,即使仅有一次自发性血栓事件。
评估尸检人群中因子V莱顿突变和凝血酶原基因突变的发生率,并确定这些检测是否有助于识别高危家庭成员。
我们使用存档组织和多重等位基因特异性聚合酶链反应扩增技术,分析了45例因血栓事件死亡或死于血栓事件的患者的因子V莱顿突变和凝血酶原基因突变。所有45例患者均扩增出野生型因子V基因,而29例患者扩增出野生型凝血酶原基因。
两名分别在35岁和92岁时死于血栓事件的患者(4.4%)为因子V基因突变杂合子。另外两名分别在26岁和39岁时死于血栓事件的患者(6.7%)为凝血酶原基因突变杂合子。在我们的研究中未检测到因子V或凝血酶原基因纯合子患者或同时为两个基因杂合子的患者。
我们的研究结果表明,对死于血栓事件的老年患者的亲属进行筛查不具有成本效益,因为这些突变在尸检人群中的发生率较低。然而,由于这些突变在39岁及以下死亡的个体中出现的频率明显更高,对这部分患者的亲属进行检测可能有助于发现可从预防性抗凝治疗中获益的高危个体。