Jensen L, Tienda M
Migr World Mag. 1987;15(5):7-13.
Central to the controversy over the new immigration is the worry that it has promoted an increase in the level of poverty and welfare utilization among immigrants. This study documents and explains immigrant-native trends and differentials in poverty and public assistance utilization during the period from 1960-1980. Results show that there is ample evidence that the level of poverty among immigrants, particularly recent immigrants, increased over the 1960-1980 period. However, there was little indication of a commensurate rise in the propensity of families to receive public assistance. There is also little evidence of a disproportionate and increasing burden of immigrants on public assistance coffers as the new immigration proceeds. Recent immigrants are no more likely to receive welfare than otherwise comparable natives. Regarding average annual public assistance income among welfare families, the empirical results suggest that immigrants differ little from natives in their degree of utilization. Like immigrants of previous waves, the new immigrants appear to be industrious and able to capitalize on their labor force potential to keep them out of poverty. This conclusion derives from findings that 1) in both the tabular and multivariate context, multiple earners kept a greater % of immigrant than native families out of poverty, and 2) immigrants showed a relative disinclination to use welfare as an income maintenance strategy. Still, the decline over time in ameliorative impact of multiple earners should be a source of concern. Also central to the concern over the new immigration is the increasing prevalence of nonwhites among immigrant cohorts. The sizable Hispanic component of the new immigration is particularly controversial. Among the most consistent findings of this study is the apparent deterioration in the economic status of white immigrants and the noticeable lack of any similar deterioration among Hispanic families. For example, among all the groups studied, recent white immigrants registered the largest increases in poverty over time. Poverty among recent Hispanic immigrants did not increase as sharply. Also, Hispanics became increasingly reluctant to use public assistance income whereas recent white immigrants did not, and revealed an increase in mean annual welfare receipt not nearly as great as that for white and Asian families. Admittedly, rates of poverty and public assistance receipt continue to be greater among Hispanics than whites. Still, changes over time reveal a marked deterioration among whites but no such deterioration among Hispanics.
围绕新移民问题的争议核心在于人们担心它促使移民中的贫困水平和福利利用率上升。本研究记录并解释了1960年至1980年期间移民与本土居民在贫困和公共援助利用方面的趋势及差异。结果显示,有充分证据表明,在1960年至1980年期间,移民尤其是新移民中的贫困水平有所上升。然而,几乎没有迹象表明家庭接受公共援助的倾向相应增加。随着新移民的增加,也几乎没有证据表明移民给公共援助资金带来了不成比例且不断增加的负担。新移民获得福利的可能性并不比其他条件相当的本土居民更高。关于福利家庭的年均公共援助收入,实证结果表明移民在利用程度上与本土居民差异不大。与前几批移民一样,新移民似乎勤劳且能够利用自身劳动力潜力避免陷入贫困。这一结论源于以下发现:1)在表格和多变量分析中,多收入者使移民家庭而非本土家庭摆脱贫困的比例更高;2)移民相对不愿意将福利作为维持收入的策略。尽管如此,多收入者改善状况的影响随时间推移而下降这一点应引起关注。对新移民问题的担忧核心还包括移民群体中非白人的比例不断上升。新移民中相当大比例的西班牙裔群体尤其具有争议性。本研究最一致的发现之一是白人移民的经济状况明显恶化,而西班牙裔家庭则明显没有类似的恶化。例如,在所有研究群体中,近期白人移民的贫困率随时间上升幅度最大。近期西班牙裔移民的贫困率上升幅度没有那么大。此外,西班牙裔越来越不愿意使用公共援助收入,而近期白人移民并非如此,且其年均福利收入的增幅远不及白人和亚裔家庭。诚然,西班牙裔的贫困率和公共援助领取率仍然高于白人。不过,随时间变化显示出白人明显恶化而西班牙裔没有这种恶化的情况。