Borrie J, Lichter I
Br J Surg. 1975 Mar;62(3):186-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800620305.
Experience with 40 patients and 150 pacemakersss is reviewed. In 13 patients the initial pacing was by epicardial electrodes and in 27 by transvenous catheter electrodes. When epicardial systems were used, two electrodes were always fixed to the heart, the additional electrode being provided for temporary pacing and as a spare in case of future need. The battery unit was usually buried behind the rectus abdominis muscle. Vacuum drainage of the pacemaker pocket was used and was considered helpful in avoiding some complications. The right cephalic vein was preferred for transvenous pacing but existing venous abnormalities sometimes required use of the external jugular vein. Five patients had epicardial systems changed to transvenous ones, and in 5 the reverse procedure was needed. Pacemaker battery problems included inadequate soft tissue protection for the unit, epoxy resion fracture, titanium case leak and problems relating to design change and the special needs for overseas travel. While the danger from diathermy and radiofrequency is now recognized, similar dangers exist for those paced by 'demand' units in large electromagnetic fields.
回顾了40例患者和150个起搏器的使用经验。13例患者最初采用心外膜电极起搏,27例采用经静脉导管电极起搏。使用心外膜系统时,总是将两个电极固定在心脏上,额外的电极用于临时起搏,并作为备用以备将来之需。电池单元通常埋在腹直肌后方。采用起搏器囊袋真空引流,认为这有助于避免一些并发症。经静脉起搏首选右侧头静脉,但现有的静脉异常有时需要使用颈外静脉。5例患者的心外膜系统改为经静脉系统,5例需要进行相反的操作。起搏器电池问题包括对电池单元的软组织保护不足、环氧树脂断裂、钛壳泄漏以及与设计变更和海外旅行特殊需求相关的问题。虽然现在已经认识到透热疗法和射频的危险,但在大电磁场中使用“按需”起搏器的患者也存在类似危险。