Schulz Richard, O'Brien Alison, Czaja Sara, Ory Marcia, Norris Rachel, Martire Lynn M, Belle Steven H, Burgio Lou, Gitlin Laura, Coon David, Burns Robert, Gallagher-Thompson Dolores, Stevens Alan
University Center for Social and Urban Research, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Gerontologist. 2002 Oct;42(5):589-602. doi: 10.1093/geront/42.5.589.
We reviewed intervention studies that reported dementia caregiver outcomes published since 1996, including psychosocial interventions for caregivers and environmental and pharmacological interventions for care recipients. Our goal was to focus on issues of clinical significance in caregiver intervention research in order to move the field toward a greater emphasis on achieving reliable and clinically meaningful outcomes.
MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health databases from 1996 through 2001 were searched to identify articles and book chapters mapping to two medical subject headings: caregivers and either dementia or Alzheimer's disease. Articles were evaluated on two dimensions, outcomes in four domains thought to be important to the individual or society and the magnitude of reported effects for these outcomes in order to determine if they were large enough to be clinically meaningful.
Although many studies have reported small to moderate statistically significant effects on a broad range of outcomes, only a small proportion of these studies achieved clinically meaningful outcomes. Nevertheless, caregiving intervention studies have increasingly shown promise of affecting important public health outcomes in areas such as service utilization, including delayed institutionalization; psychiatric symptomatology, including the successful treatment of major and minor depression; and providing services that are highly valued by caregivers.
Assessment of clinical significance in addition to statistical significance is needed in this research area. Specific recommendations on design, measurement, and conceptual issues are made to enhance the clinical significance of future research.
我们回顾了自1996年以来发表的报告痴呆症照料者结局的干预研究,包括针对照料者的心理社会干预以及针对受照料者的环境和药物干预。我们的目标是关注照料者干预研究中具有临床意义的问题,以使该领域更加注重实现可靠且具有临床意义的结局。
检索了1996年至2001年的MEDLINE、PsycINFO以及护理与联合健康累积索引数据库,以识别映射到两个医学主题词的文章和书籍章节:照料者以及痴呆症或阿尔茨海默病。从两个维度对文章进行评估,即对个人或社会被认为重要的四个领域的结局,以及这些结局所报告效应的大小,以确定它们是否足够大到具有临床意义。
尽管许多研究报告了在广泛结局上有小到中等程度的统计学显著效应,但这些研究中只有一小部分取得了具有临床意义的结局。然而,照料干预研究越来越显示出有望在诸如服务利用(包括延迟入住机构)、精神症状学(包括成功治疗重度和轻度抑郁症)以及提供照料者高度重视的服务等领域影响重要的公共卫生结局。
该研究领域除了需要评估统计学显著性外,还需要评估临床意义。针对设计、测量和概念问题提出了具体建议,以提高未来研究的临床意义。