Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Alzheimer's and Dementia Resource Center, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Clin Gerontol. 2024 Oct-Dec;47(5):870-884. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2023.2242357. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
Evidence-based interventions for dementia caregivers, such as the Savvy Caregiver Program (SC), seek to address skills and knowledge deficits, caregiver burden, depressive symptoms, and grief. Little research has examined mechanisms by which these interventions accomplish their goals. Caregiver preparedness may be a possible mechanism by which caregiver interventions may confer benefits.
The sample included 76 dementia caregivers who completed the 6-session SC. Participants completed the Anticipatory Grief Scale, Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale, the Preparedness for Caregiving Scale, and the Zarit Burden Interview-Short Form.
A repeated measures ANOVA was utilized to determine the interaction between baseline scores and pre-post change in caregiver preparedness. Analysis significantly predicted caregiver burden, ( = 6.68, =.012, =.10), depressive symptom endorsement, ( = 6.41, =.014, =.09, and anticipatory grief, ( = 6.22, =.02, =.1), post-treatment.
Pre-post change in caregiver preparedness significantly predicted pre-post change across measures of caregiver burden, depressive symptom endorsement, and anticipatory grief. Findings suggest that caregiver preparedness may be one mechanism by which the SC confers positive outcomes. These findings provide an empirical and theoretical basis for tailoring future dementia caregiver interventions.
Clinical Interventions may seek to improve caregiver preparedness and subsequent outcomes through utilization of programs like SC.
针对痴呆症照顾者的循证干预措施,如精明照顾者计划(SC),旨在解决技能和知识缺陷、照顾者负担、抑郁症状和悲伤问题。很少有研究探讨这些干预措施实现其目标的机制。照顾者的准备情况可能是照顾者干预措施可能带来好处的一个可能机制。
该样本包括 76 名完成 6 节 SC 的痴呆症照顾者。参与者完成了预期悲伤量表、流行病学研究中心抑郁量表、照顾准备量表和 Zarit 负担访谈-简短形式。
采用重复测量方差分析来确定基线得分与照顾者准备情况前后变化之间的交互作用。分析显著预测了照顾者负担( = 6.68,p=.012,η2=.10)、抑郁症状的认可( = 6.41,p=.014,η2=.09)和预期悲伤( = 6.22,p=.02,η2=.1),治疗后。
照顾者准备情况的前后变化显著预测了照顾者负担、抑郁症状认可和预期悲伤测量的前后变化。研究结果表明,照顾者准备情况可能是 SC 带来积极结果的一种机制。这些发现为未来的痴呆症照顾者干预措施提供了经验和理论基础。
临床干预可能会通过使用 SC 等计划来提高照顾者的准备情况和随后的结果。