Suppr超能文献

为何我们不应寻求个体对参与卫生服务研究的知情同意。

Why we should not seek individual informed consent for participation in health services research.

作者信息

Cassell J, Young A

机构信息

Department of Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, UK.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2002 Oct;28(5):313-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.28.5.313.

Abstract

Ethics committees now require that individuals give informed consent to much health services research, in the same way as for clinical research. This is misguided. Existing ethical guidelines do not help us decide how to seek consent in these cases, and have allowed managerial experimentation to remain largely unchecked. Inappropriate requirements for individual consent can institutionalise health inequalities and reduce access to services for vulnerable groups. This undermines the fundamental purpose of the National Health Service (NHS), and ignores our rights and duties as its members, explored here. Alternative forms of community consent should be actively pursued.

摘要

伦理委员会现在要求个人像参与临床研究一样,对许多医疗服务研究给予知情同意。这是一种误导。现有的伦理准则无助于我们决定在这些情况下如何寻求同意,并且使得管理性试验在很大程度上未受审查。对个人同意的不恰当要求会使健康不平等制度化,并减少弱势群体获得服务的机会。这破坏了国民医疗服务体系(NHS)的根本宗旨,也忽视了我们作为其成员的权利和义务,本文将对此进行探讨。应该积极寻求社区同意的替代形式。

相似文献

3
Ethical review of health service research in the UK: implications for nursing.
J Adv Nurs. 2002 Nov;40(4):379-86. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02385.x.
6
Rethinking research ethics.
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Oct;10(10):19-36. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.519233.
7
Members of research ethics committees accepted a modification of the randomized consent design.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Jun;58(6):589-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.11.021.
9
Research policy for nursing services: Part 1.
J Nurs Adm. 1981 Apr;11(4):30-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Consent to Use Real-World Data in Lung Cancer Radiotherapy: Decision of a Citizens' Jury for an 'Informed Opt-Out' Approach.
Health Care Anal. 2025 Jun;33(2):192-213. doi: 10.1007/s10728-025-00510-9. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
3
Is there a civic duty to support medical AI development by sharing electronic health records?
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Dec 10;23(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00871-z.
4
Building an Opt-Out Model for Service-Level Consent in the Context of New Data Regulations.
Public Health Ethics. 2022 Jan 11;15(2):175-180. doi: 10.1093/phe/phab030. eCollection 2022 Jul.
5
Considerations for an integrated population health databank in Africa: lessons from global best practices.
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Aug 23;6:214. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17000.1. eCollection 2021.
9
Informed consent and registry-based research - the case of the Danish circumcision registry.
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Sep 15;18(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0212-y.
10
Ethics and Phishing Experiments.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Aug;24(4):1241-1252. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9952-9. Epub 2017 Aug 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Consent, confidentiality, and the threat to public health surveillance.
BMJ. 2002 May 18;324(7347):1210-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1210.
2
A practical guide to informed consent to treatment.
BMJ. 2001;323(7327):1464-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7327.1464.
3
Team midwife care: maternal and infant outcomes.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001 Aug;41(3):257-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.2001.tb01225.x.
4
Genitourinary medicine services in the United Kingdom are failing to meet current demand.
Int J STD AIDS. 2001 Sep;12(9):571-2. doi: 10.1258/0956462011923732.
9
Home treatment--engimas and fantasies.
BMJ. 2000 Jan 29;320(7230):308-9.
10
The home treatment enigma.
BMJ. 2000 Jan 29;320(7230):305-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7230.305.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验