Koster Andreas, Fischer Thomas, Praus Michael, Haberzettl Helmut, Kuebler Wolfgang M, Hetzer Roland, Kuppe Herman
Department of Anesthesia, Deutsches Herzzentrum, and Institute of Physiology, Freie Universität, Berlin, Germany.
Anesthesiology. 2002 Oct;97(4):837-41. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200210000-00014.
Cardiac surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) leads to fulminant activation of the hemostatic-inflammatory system. The authors hypothesized that heparin concentration-based anticoagulation management compared with activated clotting time-based heparin management during CPB leads to more effective attenuation of hemostatic activation and inflammatory response. In a randomized prospective study, the authors compared the influence of anticoagulation with a heparin concentration-based system (Hepcon HMS; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) to that of activated clotting time-based management on the activation of the hemostatic-inflammatory system during CPB.
Two hundred elective patients (100 in each group) undergoing standard cardiac surgery in normothermia were enrolled. No antifibrinolytic agents or aprotinin and no heparin-coated CPB systems were used. Samples were collected after administration of the heparin bolus before initiation of CPB and after conclusion of CPB before protamine infusion.
There were no differences in the pre-CPB values between both groups. After CPB there were significantly higher concentrations ( < 0.05) for heparin and a significant reduction in thrombin generation (25.2 +/- 21.0 SD vs. 34.6 +/- 25.1), d-dimers (1.94 +/- 1.74 SD vs. 2.58 +/- 2.1 SD), and neutrophil elastase (715.5 +/- 412 SD vs. 856.8 +/- 428 SD), and a trend toward lower beta-thromboglobulin, C5b-9, and soluble P-selectin in the Hepcon HMS group. There were no differences in the post-CPB values for platelet count, adenosine diphosphate-stimulated platelet aggregation, antithrombin III, soluble fibrin, Factor XIIa, or postoperative blood loss.
Compared with heparin management with the activated clotting time, heparin concentration-based anticoagulation management during CPB leads to a significant reduction of thrombin generation, fibrinolysis, and neutrophil activation, whereas there is no difference in the effect on platelet activation. The generation of fibrin even in the presence of high heparin concentrations most likely has to be attributed to the reduced antithrombin III concentrations or reduced inhibition of clot-bound thrombin. Therefore, in addition to maintenance of higher heparin concentrations, monitoring and substitution of antithrombin III should be considered to ensure more efficient antithrombin activity during CPB.
涉及体外循环(CPB)的心脏手术会导致止血-炎症系统的暴发性激活。作者推测,与CPB期间基于活化凝血时间的肝素管理相比,基于肝素浓度的抗凝管理能更有效地减轻止血激活和炎症反应。在一项随机前瞻性研究中,作者比较了基于肝素浓度的系统(Hepcon HMS;美敦力公司,明尼阿波利斯,明尼苏达州)抗凝与基于活化凝血时间的管理对CPB期间止血-炎症系统激活的影响。
纳入200例行常温下标准心脏手术的择期患者(每组100例)。未使用抗纤溶药物或抑肽酶,也未使用肝素涂层的CPB系统。在CPB开始前给予肝素推注后以及CPB结束后鱼精蛋白输注前采集样本。
两组CPB前的值无差异。CPB后,Hepcon HMS组的肝素浓度显著更高(<0.05),凝血酶生成显著减少(25.2±21.0标准差 vs. 34.6±25.1),D-二聚体(1.94±1.74标准差 vs. 2.58±2.1标准差)和中性粒细胞弹性蛋白酶(715.5±412标准差 vs. 856.8±428标准差)显著降低,β-血小板球蛋白、C5b-9和可溶性P-选择素呈降低趋势。CPB后血小板计数、二磷酸腺苷刺激的血小板聚集、抗凝血酶III、可溶性纤维蛋白、因子XIIa或术后失血量的值无差异。
与基于活化凝血时间的肝素管理相比,CPB期间基于肝素浓度的抗凝管理可显著减少凝血酶生成、纤维蛋白溶解和中性粒细胞激活,而对血小板激活的影响无差异。即使在肝素浓度较高的情况下纤维蛋白的生成很可能归因于抗凝血酶III浓度降低或对凝块结合凝血酶的抑制作用降低。因此,除了维持较高的肝素浓度外,应考虑监测和补充抗凝血酶III,以确保CPB期间更有效的抗凝血酶活性。