Asay Ted P, Lambert Michael J, Gregersen Ann T, Goates Melissa K
Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
J Clin Psychol. 2002 Oct;58(10):1213-25. doi: 10.1002/jclp.10107.
The increasing emphasis on therapist accountability and empirical demonstration of psychotherapeutic treatment effectiveness points to the need for practicing therapists to integrate treatment evaluation methods into routine clinical practice. Unfortunately, most private practitioners have little involvement in carrying out evaluation procedures. In this study we demonstrate how patient-focused research was used to track the progress and outcome of patients seen by a clinical psychologist in private practice. Twenty-nine adults and 40 children/adolescents were evaluated on a weekly basis to assess the number of sessions required to reach improvement (reliable change) and recovery (clinically significant change). Dose-response survival analysis results indicated that 50% of adults reached clinically significant change in 54 sessions, and 50% of youth met the same standard in 14 sessions. These results were compared with outcome in large-scale studies. Implications of this study for integrating treatment evaluation methods into clinical practice are discussed.
对治疗师问责制的日益重视以及心理治疗效果的实证证明,表明执业治疗师需要将治疗评估方法纳入日常临床实践。不幸的是,大多数私人执业者很少参与开展评估程序。在本研究中,我们展示了如何运用以患者为中心的研究来追踪一位私人执业临床心理学家所接待患者的进展和结果。每周对29名成年人和40名儿童/青少年进行评估,以评估达到改善(可靠变化)和康复(临床显著变化)所需的疗程数。剂量反应生存分析结果表明,50%的成年人在54个疗程中达到了临床显著变化,50%的青少年在14个疗程中达到了相同标准。将这些结果与大规模研究的结果进行了比较。讨论了本研究对于将治疗评估方法整合到临床实践中的意义。