Buist Anne E, Barnett Bryanne E W, Milgrom Jeannette, Pope Sherryl, Condon John T, Ellwood David A, Boyce Phillip M, Austin Marie-Paule V, Hayes Barbara A
Austin & Repatriation Hospital, University of Melbourne, Building 129A, Repatriation Campus, Locked Bag 1, West Heidelberg, VIC 3081, Australia.
Med J Aust. 2002 Oct 7;177(S7):S101-5. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04866.x.
Significant perinatal distress and depression affects 14% of women, producing short and long term consequences for the family. This suggests that measures for early detection are important, and non-identification of these women may exacerbate difficulties. Screening provides an opportunity to access large numbers of women and facilitate pathways to best-practice care. A valid, reliable, economical screening tool (the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, EPDS) is available. Arguments against screening pertain largely to lack of evidence about the acceptability of routine use of the EPDS during pregnancy and the postnatal period, and inadequate evidence regarding outcomes and cost-effectiveness. To address these concerns, the National Postnatal Depression Prevention and Early Intervention Program will evaluate outcomes of screening in terms of acceptability, cost-effectiveness, access and satisfaction with management in up to 100 000 women.
显著的围产期困扰和抑郁影响着14%的女性,会给家庭带来短期和长期的后果。这表明早期检测措施很重要,未能识别出这些女性可能会使困难加剧。筛查为接触大量女性并促进她们获得最佳护理提供了机会。一种有效、可靠且经济的筛查工具(爱丁堡产后抑郁量表,EPDS)已经存在。反对筛查的观点主要涉及缺乏关于在孕期和产后常规使用EPDS的可接受性的证据,以及关于结果和成本效益的证据不足。为解决这些问题,国家产后抑郁预防和早期干预项目将在多达10万名女性中评估筛查在可接受性、成本效益、可及性以及对管理的满意度方面的结果。