Use of zoledronate to treat osteoblastic versus osteolytic lesions in a severe-combined-immunodeficient mouse model.

Prostate adenocarcinoma is associated with the formation of osteoblastic metastases in bone. It has been hypothesized that osteoclastic bone resorption is a critical component before the development of these osteoblastic lesions in bone. This observation has led researchers to test agents that inhibit osteoclastic activity to prevent or halt the formation of metastatic prostate cancer lesions in bone. Bisphosphonates inhibit osteoclast activity, and previous studies showed that they have the ability to reduce the osteolytic bone resorption associated with multiple myeloma and breast cancer. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of zoledronate in limiting the formation and/or progression of osteoblastic lesions produced by the injection of known prostate cancer cells (LAPC-9 and PC-3 cells) into the tibia of SCID mice. The mice were treated with either 30- micro g or 150- micro g doses of zoledronate before tumor implantation (pretreatment group), or at weekly intervals after tumor implantation (weekly treatment group), or weekly starting one month after tumor implantation (delayed-treatment group). The zoledronate was very effective in limiting the formation of osteolytic lesions in PC-3 implanted tibias by inhibiting osteoclast activity. Radiographic and histological analysis at weekly intervals revealed that osteolytic lesions developed in the control tibias by 2 weeks, and there was complete destruction of the cortical bone in much of the proximal tibias by 4 weeks. In the treatment groups, there was minimal cortical destruction noted in the weekly treatment groups at both doses, whereas mild cortical erosion was evident in the pretreatment groups, with more cortical destruction noted in the 30- micro g group compared with the 150- micro g group. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining showed that zoledronate decreased osteoclastic numbers and that there was a dose-dependent response. In tibias implanted with the LAPC-9 cells, the zoledronate was not effective in halting the formation of the osteoblastic lesions. Radiographic and histological analysis revealed that osteoblastic lesions either had formed or were developing in 18 of 18 of the control tibias and 36 of 36 of the treated tibias at 8 weeks regardless of dose or treatment schedule. Furthermore, TRAP staining demonstrated that osteoblastic lesions had formed in the LAPC-9 tibias under conditions in which osteoclast numbers were significantly reduced. These results suggest that osteoclast activity may not be critical for the development of osteoblastic lesions associated with prostate tumor cells. Hence, bisphosphonates may not be ideal agents to prevent the formation of osteoblastic lesions associated with prostate cancer metastases to bone.