• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

流感嗜血杆菌时代后区分儿童细菌性与无菌性脑膜炎的多变量预测模型的开发与验证

Development and validation of a multivariable predictive model to distinguish bacterial from aseptic meningitis in children in the post-Haemophilus influenzae era.

作者信息

Nigrovic Lise E, Kuppermann Nathan, Malley Richard

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2002 Oct;110(4):712-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.4.712.

DOI:10.1542/peds.110.4.712
PMID:12359784
Abstract

CONTEXT

Children with meningitis are routinely admitted to the hospital and administered broad-spectrum antibiotics pending culture results because distinguishing bacterial meningitis from aseptic meningitis is often difficult.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a simple multivariable model to distinguish bacterial meningitis from aseptic meningitis in children using objective parameters available at the time of patient presentation.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of all children with meningitis admitted to 1 urban children's hospital from July 1992 through June 2000, randomly divided into derivation (66%) and validation sets (34%).

PATIENTS

Six hundred ninety-six previously healthy children aged 29 days to 19 years, of whom 125 (18%) had bacterial meningitis and 571 (82%) had aseptic meningitis.

INTERVENTION

Multivariable logistic regression and recursive partitioning analyses identified the following predictors of bacterial meningitis from the derivation set: Gram stain of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) showing bacteria, CSF protein > or =80 mg/dL, peripheral absolute neutrophil count > or =10 000 cells/mm3, seizure before or at time of presentation, and CSF absolute neutrophil count > or =1000 cells/mm3. A Bacterial Meningitis Score (BMS) was developed on the derivation set by attributing 2 points for a positive Gram stain and 1 point for each of the other variables.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The accuracy of the BMS when applied to the validation set.

RESULTS

A BMS of 0 accurately identified patients with aseptic meningitis without misclassifying any child with bacterial meningitis in the validation set. The negative predictive value of a score of 0 for bacterial meningitis was 100% (95% confidence interval: 97%-100%). A BMS > or =2 predicted bacterial meningitis with a sensitivity of 87% (95% confidence interval: 72%-96%).

CONCLUSIONS

The BMS accurately identifies children at low (BMS = 0) or high (BMS > or =2) risk of bacterial meningitis. Outpatient management may be considered for children in the low-risk group.

摘要

背景

由于区分细菌性脑膜炎和无菌性脑膜炎通常很困难,患有脑膜炎的儿童通常会被收治入院,并在培养结果出来之前使用广谱抗生素。

目的

利用患者就诊时可用的客观参数,开发并验证一个简单的多变量模型,以区分儿童细菌性脑膜炎和无菌性脑膜炎。

设计

对1992年7月至2000年6月期间入住一家城市儿童医院的所有脑膜炎患儿进行回顾性队列研究,随机分为推导组(66%)和验证组(34%)。

患者

696名年龄在29天至19岁之间的既往健康儿童,其中125名(18%)患有细菌性脑膜炎,571名(82%)患有无菌性脑膜炎。

干预

多变量逻辑回归和递归划分分析从推导组中确定了以下细菌性脑膜炎的预测因素:脑脊液(CSF)革兰氏染色显示细菌、CSF蛋白≥80mg/dL、外周绝对中性粒细胞计数≥10000个/mm³、就诊前或就诊时癫痫发作以及CSF绝对中性粒细胞计数≥1000个/mm³。通过对革兰氏染色阳性赋予2分,对其他每个变量赋予1分,在推导组上制定了细菌性脑膜炎评分(BMS)。

主要观察指标

BMS应用于验证组时的准确性。

结果

BMS为0准确识别了无菌性脑膜炎患者,在验证组中没有将任何细菌性脑膜炎患儿误分类。BMS评分为0对细菌性脑膜炎的阴性预测值为100%(95%置信区间:97%-100%)。BMS≥2预测细菌性脑膜炎的敏感性为87%(9置信区间:72%-96%)。

结论

BMS准确识别出细菌性脑膜炎低风险(BMS = 0)或高风险(BMS≥2)的儿童。对于低风险组的儿童,可以考虑门诊管理。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a multivariable predictive model to distinguish bacterial from aseptic meningitis in children in the post-Haemophilus influenzae era.流感嗜血杆菌时代后区分儿童细菌性与无菌性脑膜炎的多变量预测模型的开发与验证
Pediatrics. 2002 Oct;110(4):712-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.4.712.
2
Clinical Prediction Rule for Distinguishing Bacterial From Aseptic Meningitis.临床鉴别细菌性脑膜炎与无菌性脑膜炎的预测规则。
Pediatrics. 2020 Sep;146(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-1126. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
3
Identifying low-risk patients for bacterial meningitis in adult patients with acute meningitis.识别成年急性脑膜炎患者中细菌性脑膜炎的低风险患者。
Intern Med. 2009;48(7):537-43. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.48.1832. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
4
External validation of the bacterial meningitis score in children hospitalized with meningitis.对因脑膜炎住院儿童的细菌性脑膜炎评分进行外部验证。
Acta Clin Belg. 2012 Jul-Aug;67(4):282-5. doi: 10.2143/ACB.67.4.2062673.
5
[Validation of a clinical prediction rule to distinguish bacterial from aseptic meningitis].[用于区分细菌性脑膜炎与无菌性脑膜炎的临床预测规则的验证]
Arch Argent Pediatr. 2010 Feb;108(1):40-4. doi: 10.1590/S0325-00752010000100008.
6
Serum procalcitonin and other biologic markers to distinguish between bacterial and aseptic meningitis.血清降钙素原及其他生物标志物用于鉴别细菌性脑膜炎和无菌性脑膜炎。
J Pediatr. 2006 Jul;149(1):72-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.02.034.
7
USE OF SCORE AND CEREBROSPINAL FLUID LACTATE DOSAGE IN DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF BACTERIAL AND ASEPTIC MENINGITIS.评分及脑脊液乳酸含量在细菌性和无菌性脑膜炎鉴别诊断中的应用
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2017 Oct-Dec;35(4):369-374. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/;2017;35;4;00010.
8
Diagnostic value of immature neutrophils (bands) in the cerebrospinal fluid of children with cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis.未成熟中性粒细胞(杆状核细胞)在脑脊液细胞增多症患儿脑脊液中的诊断价值。
Pediatrics. 2009 Jun;123(6):e967-71. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1742. Epub 2009 May 18.
9
[Distinction between bacterial and aseptic meningitis in children: refinement of a clinical decision rule].[儿童细菌性脑膜炎与无菌性脑膜炎的鉴别:临床决策规则的完善]
Arch Pediatr. 2007 May;14(5):434-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2006.12.009. Epub 2007 Jan 26.
10
Cerebrospinal fluid findings in aseptic versus bacterial meningitis.无菌性脑膜炎与细菌性脑膜炎的脑脊液检查结果
Pediatrics. 2000 Feb;105(2):316-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.2.316.

引用本文的文献

1
A Machine Learning Approach for Identifying People With Neuroinfectious Diseases in Electronic Health Records: Algorithm Development and Validation.一种用于在电子健康记录中识别神经感染性疾病患者的机器学习方法:算法开发与验证
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Aug 29;13:e63157. doi: 10.2196/63157.
2
Diagnostic prediction models for bacterial meningitis in children with a suspected central nervous system infection: a systematic review and prospective validation study.疑似中枢神经系统感染儿童细菌性脑膜炎的诊断预测模型:一项系统评价和前瞻性验证研究
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 7;14(8):e081172. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081172.
3
Validation of a Clinical Prediction Rule for Distinguishing Bacterial and Aseptic Meningitis in Pediatric Patients.
鉴别小儿细菌性和无菌性脑膜炎的临床预测规则的验证
Cureus. 2023 Sep 23;15(9):e45829. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45829. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Development a prediction model for identifying bacterial meningitis in young infants aged 29-90 days: a retrospective analysis.建立一个预测模型以识别 29-90 日龄婴儿细菌性脑膜炎:一项回顾性分析。
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Feb 9;23(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03813-1.
5
Ability of Procalcitonin and C-Reactive Protein for Discriminating between Bacterial and Enteroviral Meningitis in Children Using Decision Tree.使用决策树评估降钙素原和C反应蛋白在鉴别儿童细菌性和肠道病毒性脑膜炎中的能力
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Aug 2;2021:5519436. doi: 10.1155/2021/5519436. eCollection 2021.
6
Cerebrospinal fluid proteome maps detect pathogen-specific host response patterns in meningitis.脑脊液蛋白质组图谱可检测脑膜炎中病原体特异性的宿主反应模式。
Elife. 2021 Apr 6;10:e64159. doi: 10.7554/eLife.64159.
7
An improved clinical prediction rule for identifying neonatal bacterial meningitis: a multicenter cohort study.一种用于识别新生儿细菌性脑膜炎的改良临床预测规则:一项多中心队列研究。
Transl Pediatr. 2021 Jan;10(1):64-72. doi: 10.21037/tp-20-255.
8
Management of Acute Bacterial Meningitis in Children.儿童急性细菌性脑膜炎的管理
Infect Drug Resist. 2020 Nov 11;13:4077-4089. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S240162. eCollection 2020.
9
Etiology, Clinical Presentation and Incidence of Infectious Meningitis and Encephalitis in Polish Children.波兰儿童感染性脑膜炎和脑炎的病因、临床表现及发病率
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 22;9(8):2324. doi: 10.3390/jcm9082324.
10
Epidemiology of herpes simplex and varicella zoster virus in cerebrospinal fluid of patients suffering from meningitis in Iran.伊朗脑膜炎患者脑脊液中单纯疱疹病毒和水痘带状疱疹病毒的流行病学研究
New Microbes New Infect. 2020 Apr 30;36:100688. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100688. eCollection 2020 Jul.