Suppr超能文献

美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会术前评估指南降低了主动脉手术前的资源利用率。

American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association preoperative assessment guidelines reduce resource utilization before aortic surgery.

作者信息

Froehlich James B, Karavite Dean, Russman Pamela L, Erdem Nurum, Wise Chris, Zelenock Gerald, Wakefield Thomas, Stanley James, Eagle Kim A

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worchester, MA 01655, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2002 Oct;36(4):758-63. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.127344.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Methods used for evaluation of cardiac risk before noncardiac surgery vary widely. We evaluated the effect over time on practice and resource utilization of implementing the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines on Preoperative Risk Assessment.

METHODS

We compared 102 historical control patients who underwent elective abdominal aortic surgery (from January 1993 to December 1994) with 94 consecutive patients after guideline implementation (from July 1995 to December 1996) and 104 patients in a late after guideline implementation (from July 1, 1997, to September 30, 1998). Resource use (testing, revascularization, and costs) and outcomes (perioperative death and myocardial infarction) were examined. Patients with and without clinical markers of risk for perioperative cardiac complications were compared.

RESULTS

The use of preoperative stress testing (88% to 47%; P <.00001), cardiac catheterization (24% to 11%; P <.05), and coronary revascularization (25% to 2%; P <.00001) decreased between control and postguideline groups, respectively. These changes persisted in the late postguideline group. Mean preoperative evaluation costs also fell ($1087 versus $171; P <.0001). Outcomes of death (4% versus 3% versus 2%) and myocardial infarction (7% versus 3% versus 5%) were not significantly different between control, postguideline, and late postguideline groups, respectively. Stress test rates were similar for patients at low risk versus high risk in the historical control group (84% versus 91%; P =.29) but lower for patients at low risk after guideline implementation (31% versus 61%; P =.003).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association cardiac risk assessment guidelines appropriately reduced resource use and costs in patients who underwent elective aortic surgery without affecting outcomes. This effect was sustained 2 years after guideline implementation.

摘要

背景

非心脏手术前评估心脏风险的方法差异很大。我们评估了随着时间推移,实施美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会术前风险评估指南对实践和资源利用的影响。

方法

我们将102例接受择期腹主动脉手术的历史对照患者(1993年1月至1994年12月)与94例指南实施后的连续患者(1995年7月至1996年12月)以及104例指南实施后期的患者(1997年7月1日至1998年9月30日)进行了比较。检查了资源使用情况(检查、血运重建和费用)以及结局(围手术期死亡和心肌梗死)。对有和没有围手术期心脏并发症风险临床标志物的患者进行了比较。

结果

术前应激测试的使用(88%降至47%;P<.00001)、心导管检查(24%降至11%;P<.05)和冠状动脉血运重建(25%降至2%;P<.00001)在对照组和指南实施后组之间分别下降。这些变化在指南实施后期组中持续存在。术前平均评估费用也有所下降(1087美元对171美元;P<.0001)。对照组、指南实施后组和指南实施后期组的死亡结局(4%对3%对2%)和心肌梗死结局(7%对3%对5%)分别无显著差异。历史对照组中低风险患者与高风险患者的应激测试率相似(84%对91%;P=.29),但指南实施后低风险患者的应激测试率较低(31%对61%;P=.003)。

结论

美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会心脏风险评估指南的实施适当减少了接受择期主动脉手术患者的资源使用和费用,且不影响结局。这种效果在指南实施后持续了2年。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验