Greene Barry R, Kralewski John E, Gans David N, Klinkel Dawn I
Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
J Ambul Care Manage. 2002 Oct;25(4):26-36. doi: 10.1097/00004479-200210000-00006.
This study compares the financial and productivity performance of hospital- versus physician-owned medical group practices. Nineteen hospital-owned and twenty-three physician-owned family practices were matched by location (state) and size (full-time equivalent providers). The data were obtained from the 1998 Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) Cost Survey database. The focus of this study is on the "bottom-line" performance of the organizations as well as the production costs of the different type of practices. Analyses of these data consider staffing differences, charge and revenue differentials, productivity factors, and differences in patient volume and procedure volume. When comparing the hospital-owned and physician-owned family practice groups, the statistical analysis of these data suggest that the underlying distinctions are driven by differences in the volume of patients and volume of procedures.
本研究比较了医院所有与医生所有的医疗集团业务的财务和生产绩效。19家医院所有的家庭医疗业务和23家医生所有的家庭医疗业务在地理位置(州)和规模(全职等效提供者)上进行了匹配。数据取自1998年医疗集团管理协会(MGMA)成本调查数据库。本研究的重点是这些组织的“底线”绩效以及不同类型业务的生产成本。对这些数据的分析考虑了人员配置差异、收费和收入差异、生产率因素以及患者数量和手术量的差异。在比较医院所有和医生所有的家庭医疗业务组时,这些数据的统计分析表明,根本差异是由患者数量和手术量的差异驱动的。