Berges-Gimeno M P, Simon R A, Stevenson D D
Hospital Ramon Y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Clin Exp Allergy. 2002 Oct;32(10):1491-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.01501.x.
Leukotrienes (LTs) appear to be crucial mediators of aspirin (ASA)-induced lower respiratory tract reactions. Therefore, it is logical to assume that leukotriene-modifier drugs (LTMDs) might block these reactions.
The aim of this study was to determine whether concomitant treatment with LTMDs was associated with a reduction of ASA-provoked lower respiratory tract reactions in patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), when compared to AERD patients who were not treated with LTMDs. Secondly, if ASA-induced lower respiratory tract reactions were prevented in LTMD-treated patients, was there then a higher prevalence of upper respiratory reactors or, alternatively, a higher prevalence of blocked reactions ('non-reactors') in this group.
Of 271 patients suspected by history of having AERD, 96 were taking cys-LT receptor antagonists (cys-LTRAs) and 12 were taking zileuton at the time of oral ASA challenges. A matched control group of 163 patients was not receiving LTMDs. All subjects underwent standard oral ASA challenges. Reactions were classified as follows: classic [naso-ocular combined with a 20% or > decline in forced expiratory volume of 1 s (FEV1)]; pure lower (20% or > decline in FEV1 without naso-ocular); partial asthma (naso-ocular + 15-20% decline in FEV1); upper only (naso-ocular with < 15% decline in FEV1); negative (no reactions).
In patients treated with cys-LTRAs, there were significant reductions in numbers of patients with ASA-induced bronchospastic reactions and a concomitant increase in upper respiratory reactors. There were no significant differences in mean provoking doses of ASA or the percent changes in FEV1 values in both groups. In the 12 patients receiving zileuton, no reactions to ASA (16%) were similar to the cys-LTRA-treated group (11%) and the control group (15%).
During oral ASA challenges, LTMD treatment appeared to shift target organ responses from both upper and lower respiratory tracts to upper tract alone. LTMD blocking of the entire respiratory tract did not appear to occur.
白三烯(LTs)似乎是阿司匹林(ASA)诱发的下呼吸道反应的关键介质。因此,有理由认为白三烯调节剂药物(LTMDs)可能会阻断这些反应。
本研究的目的是确定与未接受LTMDs治疗的阿司匹林加重性呼吸道疾病(AERD)患者相比,LTMDs联合治疗是否与AERD患者ASA诱发的下呼吸道反应减少有关。其次,如果LTMDs治疗的患者中ASA诱发的下呼吸道反应得到预防,那么该组中出现上呼吸道反应者的患病率是否更高,或者相反,出现阻断反应(“无反应者”)的患病率是否更高。
在271例因病史怀疑患有AERD的患者中,96例在进行口服ASA激发试验时正在服用半胱氨酰白三烯受体拮抗剂(cys-LTRAs),12例正在服用齐留通。163例患者组成的匹配对照组未接受LTMDs治疗。所有受试者均接受标准口服ASA激发试验。反应分类如下:典型反应[鼻眼症状合并1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)下降20%或更多];单纯下呼吸道反应(FEV1下降20%或更多且无鼻眼症状);部分哮喘(鼻眼症状+FEV1下降15%-20%);仅上呼吸道反应(鼻眼症状且FEV1下降<15%);阴性反应(无反应)。
在接受cys-LTRAs治疗的患者中,ASA诱发的支气管痉挛反应患者数量显著减少,同时上呼吸道反应者数量增加。两组中ASA的平均激发剂量或FEV1值的百分比变化无显著差异。在12例接受齐留通治疗的患者中,对ASA无反应者(16%)与接受cys-LTRAs治疗的组(11%)和对照组(15%)相似。
在口服ASA激发试验期间,LTMD治疗似乎将靶器官反应从上、下呼吸道转移到仅上呼吸道。似乎未出现LTMD对整个呼吸道的阻断作用。