Clamp Andrew, Danson Sarah, Clemons Mark
Department of Medical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Lancet Oncol. 2002 Oct;3(10):611-9. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(02)00875-6.
Breast cancer remains a leading cause of female morbidity and mortality worldwide. Many hormonal and genetic risk factors have been identified and have led to the development of mathematical models that can be used in the clinic to give a woman an estimate of her individual risk of developing breast cancer. These models can also be used to identify women who might benefit from breast-cancer chemoprevention with tamoxifen or be suitable for entry into trials with new agents. In this review, we discuss the relative merits of the Gail and Claus risk models. The Claus model is based mainly on family history, whereas the Gail model also includes simple markers of oestrogen exposure. We explore more sophisticated measures of lifetime oestrogen exposure that can be used to improve the discriminatory ability of these models. We also appraise the four trials of breast-cancer chemoprevention, including the trial that has led to licensing of tamoxifen for this indication in the USA. Finally, we discuss other agents and interventions that could be used in the future to improve the efficacy and tolerability of breast-cancer risk reduction.
乳腺癌仍然是全球女性发病和死亡的主要原因。许多激素和遗传风险因素已被确定,并促使了数学模型的开发,这些模型可在临床上用于估计女性患乳腺癌的个体风险。这些模型还可用于识别可能从他莫昔芬乳腺癌化学预防中获益或适合参与新药试验的女性。在本综述中,我们讨论了盖尔(Gail)风险模型和克劳斯(Claus)风险模型的相对优点。克劳斯模型主要基于家族史,而盖尔模型还包括雌激素暴露的简单标志物。我们探索了可用于提高这些模型辨别能力的更复杂的终身雌激素暴露测量方法。我们还评估了四项乳腺癌化学预防试验,包括导致他莫昔芬在美国获批用于该适应症的试验。最后,我们讨论了未来可用于提高降低乳腺癌风险的疗效和耐受性的其他药物和干预措施。