Lutchman Singh K, Muttukrishna S, Stein R C, McGarrigle H H, Patel A, Parikh B, Groome N P, Davies M C, Chatterjee R
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Free and University College London Medical School, 86-96 Chenies Mews, London WC1E 6HX, UK.
Br J Cancer. 2007 Jun 18;96(12):1808-16. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603814. Epub 2007 May 29.
Ovarian reserve can be diminished following treatment for breast cancer. This study evaluated biochemical and biophysical parameters of ovarian reserve in these patients. Biochemical and biophysical tests of ovarian reserve were performed simultaneously in young (age 22-42 years), regularly menstruating women with breast cancer (n=22) and age-matched controls (n=24). All tests were performed before (baseline) and after transient ovarian stimulation in the early follicular phase. Patients were recruited both before and after completion of chemotherapy, with some patients being followed up prospectively. Serum samples were analysed for follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinising hormone (LH), oestradiol (E(2)), inhibins A and B, and antimullerian hormone (AMH). Biophysical (ultrasound) tests included ovarian volume, antral follicle count (AFC), ovarian stromal blood flow and uterine dimensions. Significant differences were revealed (when compared with the controls) for basal FSH (11.32+/-1.48 vs 6.62+/-0.42 mIU ml(-1), P<0.001), basal AMH (0.95+/-0.34 vs 7.89+/-1.62 ng ml(-1), P<0.001) and basal inhibin B (19.24+/-4.56 vs 83.61+/-13.45 pg ml(-1), P<0.001). Following transient ovarian stimulation, there were significant differences in the increment change (Delta) for inhibin B (3.02+/-2.3 vs 96.82+/-16.38 pg ml(-1), P<0.001) and E(2) (107.8+/-23.95 vs 283.2+/-40.34 pg ml(-1), P<0.01). AFC was the only biophysical parameter that was significantly different between patients and the controls (7.80+/-0.85 vs 16.77+/-1.11, P<0.001). Basal and stimulated biochemical (serum AMH, FSH, inhibin B and E(2)) and biophysical (AFC) tests may be potential markers of ovarian reserve in young women with breast cancer.
乳腺癌治疗后卵巢储备功能可能会降低。本研究评估了这些患者卵巢储备的生化和生物物理参数。对年龄在22至42岁、月经规律的乳腺癌女性患者(n = 22)和年龄匹配的对照组(n = 24)同时进行了卵巢储备的生化和生物物理检测。所有检测均在卵泡早期短暂卵巢刺激前(基线)和刺激后进行。在化疗完成前后均招募了患者,部分患者进行了前瞻性随访。分析血清样本中的促卵泡激素(FSH)、促黄体生成素(LH)、雌二醇(E₂)、抑制素A和B以及抗苗勒管激素(AMH)。生物物理(超声)检测包括卵巢体积、窦卵泡计数(AFC)、卵巢基质血流和子宫尺寸。结果显示,与对照组相比,基础FSH(11.32±1.48 vs 6.62±0.42 mIU/ml,P<0.001)、基础AMH(0.95±0.34 vs 7.89±1.62 ng/ml,P<0.001)和基础抑制素B(19.24±4.56 vs 83.61±13.45 pg/ml,P<0.001)存在显著差异。短暂卵巢刺激后,抑制素B(3.02±2.3 vs 96.82±16.38 pg/ml,P<0.001)和E₂(107.8±23.95 vs 283.2±40.34 pg/ml,P<0.01)的增量变化(Δ)存在显著差异。AFC是患者与对照组之间唯一存在显著差异的生物物理参数(7.80±0.85 vs 16.77±1.11,P<0.001)。基础和刺激后的生化(血清AMH、FSH、抑制素B和E₂)以及生物物理(AFC)检测可能是年轻乳腺癌女性卵巢储备的潜在标志物。