Borges Adrian C, Walde Torsten, Reibis Rona K, Grohmann Andrea, Ziebig Reinhard, Rutsch Wolfgang, Schimke Ingolf, Baumann Gert
Medizinische Klinik (Kardiologie, Pneumologie und Angiologie), Universitätsklinikum Charité, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin, Germany.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002 Oct;15(10 Pt 1):1080-6. doi: 10.1067/mje.2002.121833.
Myocardial contrast echocardiography is a promising diagnostic tool for detecting microvascular integrity. Multiple experimental laboratories have shown that diagnostic combined microbubble contrast and ultrasound exposure can cause vessel rupture and myocardial damage in laboratory animals. This study investigated the phenomenon of contrast ultrasonically induced myocardial damage in human beings. Twenty consecutive patients (mean age of 60 +/- 12 years, 14 men) underwent contrast echocardiography with intravenous Optison using a mechanical index of at least 1.4 (Vivid Five System (GE, Vingmed Ultrasound, Horton, Norway). Creatine kinase (CK), creatine kinase-isoenzyme MB (CK-MB); CK-MB mass, myoglobin, and troponin I were measured before and 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours after contrast echocardiography. There was no significant correlation concerning the response to contrast echocardiography for any pair of parameters at any time after the intervention. Only in 2 patients were there higher values for troponin I before and after contrast echocardiography without an increase of myoglobin, CK, or CK-MB mass and activity. These values were therefore interpreted as false positive because of renal failure and severe heart failure. The use of contrast echocardiography is without demonstrated risk of myocardial damage even in patients with different cardiologic entities.
心肌对比超声心动图是一种很有前景的检测微血管完整性的诊断工具。多个实验实验室已表明,诊断性联合使用微泡造影剂和超声照射可在实验动物中导致血管破裂和心肌损伤。本研究调查了超声造影诱导人类心肌损伤的现象。连续20例患者(平均年龄60±12岁,14例男性)使用机械指数至少为1.4的静脉注射Optison进行对比超声心动图检查(Vivid Five系统(通用电气,挪威霍顿的Vingmed超声公司))。在对比超声心动图检查前以及检查后2、4、8和24小时测量肌酸激酶(CK)、肌酸激酶同工酶MB(CK-MB)、CK-MB质量、肌红蛋白和肌钙蛋白I。在干预后的任何时间,任何一对参数对对比超声心动图的反应均无显著相关性。仅2例患者在对比超声心动图检查前后肌钙蛋白I值较高,而肌红蛋白、CK或CK-MB质量及活性未升高。因此,由于肾衰竭和严重心力衰竭,这些值被解释为假阳性。即使在患有不同心脏疾病的患者中,使用对比超声心动图也未显示出有心肌损伤的风险。