• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Foul weather friends: big business and health care reform in the 1990s in historical perspective.

作者信息

Swenson Peter, Greer Scott

机构信息

Northwestern University, USA.

出版信息

J Health Polit Policy Law. 2002 Aug;27(4):605-38. doi: 10.1215/03616878-27-4-605.

DOI:10.1215/03616878-27-4-605
PMID:12374291
Abstract

Existing accounts of the Clinton health reform efforts of the early 1990s neglect to examine how the change in big business reform interests during the short period between the late 1980s and 1994 might have altered the trajectory of compulsory health insurance legislation in Congress. This article explores evidence that big employers lost their early interest in reform because they believed their private remedies for bringing down health cost inflation were finally beginning to work. This had a discouraging effect on reform efforts. Historical analysis shows how hard times during the Great Depression also aligned big business interests with those of reformers seeking compulsory social insurance. Unlike the present case, however, the economic climate did not quickly improve, and the social insurance reform of the New Deal succeeded. The article speculates, therefore, that had employer health expenditures not flattened out, continuing and even growing big business support might have neutralized small business and other opposition that contributed heavily to the failure of reform. Thus in light of the Clinton administration's demonstrated willingness to compromise with business on details of its plan, some kind of major reform might have succeeded.

摘要

相似文献

1
Foul weather friends: big business and health care reform in the 1990s in historical perspective.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2002 Aug;27(4):605-38. doi: 10.1215/03616878-27-4-605.
2
Rekindling reform--how goes business?重启改革——进展如何?
Am J Public Health. 2003 Jan;93(1):92-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.1.92.
3
The Clinton plan: with malice toward none and health security for all.克林顿计划:不怀恶意,保障全民健康安全。
J Am Health Policy. 1993 Nov-Dec;3(6):9-13.
4
Beyond interests and institutions: US health policy reform and the surprising silence of big business.超越利益与机构:美国医疗政策改革与大企业惊人的沉默
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2014 Feb;39(1):5-34. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2395163. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
5
The missing millions: organized labor, business, and the defeat of Clinton's Health Security Act.失踪的数百万人:有组织的劳工、企业与克林顿医保安全法案的失败
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1999 Jun;24(3):489-529. doi: 10.1215/03616878-24-3-489.
6
Small-business winners and losers under health care reform.医疗保健改革背景下的小企业赢家与输家。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1994;13(2):221-33. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.13.2.221.
7
The Clinton plan: what happened to the tough choices?克林顿计划:那些艰难抉择后来怎样了?
Health Aff (Millwood). 1994 Spring;13(1):147-60. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.13.1.147.
8
The Clinton plan: a researcher examines reform.
Health Aff (Millwood). 1994 Spring;13(1):102-14. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.13.1.102.
9
How would business react to an employer mandate?企业会如何应对雇主强制令?
Health Aff (Millwood). 1994;13(2):69-83. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.13.2.69.
10
Health reform: what will it take to pass?医疗改革:要通过需具备哪些条件?
Health Aff (Millwood). 1994 Spring;13(1):179-91. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.13.1.179.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Associated With Failure of Health System Reform: A Systematic Review and Meta-synthesis.与卫生系统改革失败相关的因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2023 Mar;56(2):128-144. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.22.394. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
2
Lessons for the United States From Single-Payer Systems.美国可以从单一支付者体系中学到的经验。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Nov;109(11):1493-1496. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305312. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
3
"Our reach is wide by any corporate standard": how the tobacco industry helped defeat the Clinton health plan and why it matters now.
“按照任何企业标准衡量,我们的影响力都很广泛”:烟草业如何帮助击败克林顿的健康计划,以及为何这在当下很重要。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Jul;100(7):1174-88. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.179150. Epub 2010 May 13.