Rushby Jacqueline A, Barry Robert J, Johnstone Stuart S
Brain and Behaviour Research Institute and Department of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong 2522, Australia.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2002 Oct;46(1):13-27. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8760(02)00037-5.
Twenty undergraduate students participated in an elaborative learning test to evaluate the relationship between electrical brain activity and subsequently recalled and not-recalled words. Data collected from the midline (Fz, Cz, Pz) and lateral scalp sites (F3, F4, C3, C4, P3, P4) were analysed. The difference between event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by subsequently recalled and not-recalled words, the ERP memory effect, was evaluated for each portion (primacy, plateau and recency) of the serial-position curve (SPC). We compared peak amplitudes for the P1, N1, P2, N400, P3 and frontal positive slow wave (FPSW) components. The electrophysiological data support the hypothesis that different mechanisms underlie primacy and recency effects during free recall paradigms. There was no support for the hypothesis that an association arises between memory and the FPSW when subjects utilise elaborative learning strategies. The P2 component predicted subsequent recall at the primacy portion of the SPC, and P1 predicted recall at the primacy and plateau portions of the curve. The findings suggest that the early positive components of the ERP (i.e. P1 and P2) are useful indices of the differential stimulus processing during elaborative learning which predicts later recall.
20名本科生参加了一项精细加工学习测试,以评估脑电活动与随后回忆起和未回忆起的单词之间的关系。对从中线(Fz、Cz、Pz)和头皮外侧部位(F3、F4、C3、C4、P3、P4)收集的数据进行了分析。针对系列位置曲线(SPC)的每个部分(首因、平台期和近因),评估了由随后回忆起和未回忆起的单词所引发的事件相关电位(ERP)之间的差异,即ERP记忆效应。我们比较了P1、N1、P2、N400、P3和额部正慢波(FPSW)成分的峰值幅度。电生理数据支持这样的假设:在自由回忆范式中,首因效应和近因效应背后存在不同的机制。当受试者采用精细加工学习策略时,没有证据支持记忆与FPSW之间存在关联这一假设。P2成分预测了SPC首因部分的后续回忆,而P1预测了曲线首因和平台期部分的回忆。研究结果表明,ERP的早期正向成分(即P1和P2)是精细加工学习过程中差异刺激处理的有用指标,这种差异刺激处理可预测后期的回忆。