Suppr超能文献

[超声图像质量与病理检测:B 型超声与明视觉成像及组织谐波成像单独及联合应用的比较]

[Image quality and detection of pathology by ultrasound: comparison of B-mode ultrasound with photopic imaging and tissue harmonic imaging alone and in combination].

作者信息

Fischer T, Filimonow S, Taupitz M, Petersein J, Beyersdorff D, Bollow M, Hamm B

机构信息

Institut für Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Charité, Humboldt-Universität Berlin.

出版信息

Rofo. 2002 Oct;174(10):1313-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-34551.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the accuracy of photopic imaging (PI) in detecting pathology by ultrasound (US) and to assess the image quality in direct comparison with conventional B-mode ultrasound and tissue harmonic imaging (THI).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty-two patients underwent US examination, among them 29 patients for abdominal assessment and 23 for otolaryngological assessment. A total of 208 freeze frames, 52 B-mode scans each with and without THI and 52 B-mode scans each with and without PI, were assessed by three readers, who determined the presence of pathology on a scale of 1 (definitely abnormal) to 5 (definitely normal). All 52 patients underwent US follow-up within six weeks. The results were confirmed by CT in 30 patients and by histology in five cases. Image quality and different color encodings of each technique were rated on a ranking scale of 1 (optimal) to 4 (poor). The different US techniques were compared in terms of image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and color encoding using McNemar's test and ROC analysis.

RESULTS

The results for image quality were as follows: B-scan 3.9; THI 1.9; PI 2.8; and THI plus PI 1.5 (each p < 0.05). The following AUCs (Area under Curve, presence of pathology) were calculated: 0.925, 0.990, and 0.990 for B-mode US, THI, and PI, respectively (not significant), and 0.994 for THI plus PI (significant compared to B-mode scan). The different color encodings were rated as follows: reddish brown 1.6, gray 1.9, blue 3.1, and green 3.6 (each p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

For ultrasound examinations, PI in combination with THI improves the image quality and conspicuity of pathology.

摘要

目的

确定明视成像(PI)在通过超声(US)检测病变方面的准确性,并与传统B型超声和组织谐波成像(THI)直接比较评估图像质量。

材料与方法

52例患者接受了超声检查,其中29例用于腹部评估,23例用于耳鼻喉科评估。共有208帧静态图像,包括52例分别有和没有THI的B型扫描以及52例分别有和没有PI的B型扫描,由三位阅片者进行评估,他们以1(肯定异常)至5(肯定正常)的等级确定病变的存在情况。所有52例患者在六周内接受了超声随访。30例患者的结果通过CT得到证实,5例通过组织学得到证实。每种技术的图像质量和不同颜色编码以1(最佳)至4(差)的等级进行评分。使用McNemar检验和ROC分析比较不同超声技术在图像质量、诊断准确性和颜色编码方面的差异。

结果

图像质量结果如下:B型扫描3.9;THI 1.9;PI 2.8;THI加PI 1.5(各p < 0.05)。计算得到以下曲线下面积(AUC,病变存在情况):B型超声为0.925,THI为0.990,PI为0.990(均无显著差异),THI加PI为0.994(与B型扫描相比有显著差异)。不同颜色编码的评分如下:红棕色1.6,灰色1.9,蓝色3.1,绿色3.6(各p < 0.05)。

结论

对于超声检查,PI与THI联合使用可提高图像质量和病变的清晰度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验