Fischer T, Filimonow S, Taupitz M, Petersein J, Beyersdorff D, Bollow M, Hamm B
Institut für Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Charité, Humboldt-Universität Berlin.
Rofo. 2002 Oct;174(10):1313-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-34551.
To determine the accuracy of photopic imaging (PI) in detecting pathology by ultrasound (US) and to assess the image quality in direct comparison with conventional B-mode ultrasound and tissue harmonic imaging (THI).
Fifty-two patients underwent US examination, among them 29 patients for abdominal assessment and 23 for otolaryngological assessment. A total of 208 freeze frames, 52 B-mode scans each with and without THI and 52 B-mode scans each with and without PI, were assessed by three readers, who determined the presence of pathology on a scale of 1 (definitely abnormal) to 5 (definitely normal). All 52 patients underwent US follow-up within six weeks. The results were confirmed by CT in 30 patients and by histology in five cases. Image quality and different color encodings of each technique were rated on a ranking scale of 1 (optimal) to 4 (poor). The different US techniques were compared in terms of image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and color encoding using McNemar's test and ROC analysis.
The results for image quality were as follows: B-scan 3.9; THI 1.9; PI 2.8; and THI plus PI 1.5 (each p < 0.05). The following AUCs (Area under Curve, presence of pathology) were calculated: 0.925, 0.990, and 0.990 for B-mode US, THI, and PI, respectively (not significant), and 0.994 for THI plus PI (significant compared to B-mode scan). The different color encodings were rated as follows: reddish brown 1.6, gray 1.9, blue 3.1, and green 3.6 (each p < 0.05).
For ultrasound examinations, PI in combination with THI improves the image quality and conspicuity of pathology.
确定明视成像(PI)在通过超声(US)检测病变方面的准确性,并与传统B型超声和组织谐波成像(THI)直接比较评估图像质量。
52例患者接受了超声检查,其中29例用于腹部评估,23例用于耳鼻喉科评估。共有208帧静态图像,包括52例分别有和没有THI的B型扫描以及52例分别有和没有PI的B型扫描,由三位阅片者进行评估,他们以1(肯定异常)至5(肯定正常)的等级确定病变的存在情况。所有52例患者在六周内接受了超声随访。30例患者的结果通过CT得到证实,5例通过组织学得到证实。每种技术的图像质量和不同颜色编码以1(最佳)至4(差)的等级进行评分。使用McNemar检验和ROC分析比较不同超声技术在图像质量、诊断准确性和颜色编码方面的差异。
图像质量结果如下:B型扫描3.9;THI 1.9;PI 2.8;THI加PI 1.5(各p < 0.05)。计算得到以下曲线下面积(AUC,病变存在情况):B型超声为0.925,THI为0.990,PI为0.990(均无显著差异),THI加PI为0.994(与B型扫描相比有显著差异)。不同颜色编码的评分如下:红棕色1.6,灰色1.9,蓝色3.1,绿色3.6(各p < 0.05)。
对于超声检查,PI与THI联合使用可提高图像质量和病变的清晰度。