Thomas A, Filimonow S, Slowinski T, Fischer T
Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universität Berlin.
Ultraschall Med. 2007 Aug;28(4):387-93. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-963041. Epub 2007 Jun 29.
To determine the accuracy of frequency compounding (FC) in detection and characterisation of breast lesions by ultrasound (US) and to assess the image quality in direct comparison with tissue harmonic imaging (THI).
A total of 60 breast lesions were examined; these were malignant in 39 cases and benign in 21 as confirmed by histology of core biopsy specimens (Aplio 80, Toshiba, Otawara, Japan). A total of 120 freeze frames, 60 B-mode scans with THI and 60 scans with FC were assessed by three independent examiners, who determined the presence of pathology on a scale of 1 to 5 using established criteria (BI-RADS classification). Image quality of each technique was rated on a ranking scale of - 2 (FC clearly superior to THI), - 1 (FC slightly superior to THI), 0 (identical), + 1 (THI slightly superior to FC), to + 2 (THI clearly superior to FC). The different US techniques were compared in terms of image quality and diagnostic accuracy using Mann Whitney U test and ROC analysis.
The results for image quality were as follows: - 0.56 +/- 0.71. In 56 % of the images FC was superior to THI, both techniques were identical in 37 % of cases, and in only 7 % THI was superior to FC. The following AUCs (Area under Curve, presence of pathology) were calculated: 0.945 and 0.969 for THI and FC, respectively (not significant). The two US techniques had comparable sensitivity (FC/THI 100/98 %) and specificity (FC/THI 76/74 %).
Altogether, the diagnostic value of FC was comparable to that of THI with only slight differences. For ultrasound examinations of breast lesions, FC improves the image quality and conspicuity of pathology.
确定频率复合成像(FC)在超声(US)检测和鉴别乳腺病变中的准确性,并与组织谐波成像(THI)直接比较评估图像质量。
共检查60个乳腺病变;经粗针活检标本组织学证实,其中39例为恶性,21例为良性(Aplio 80,东芝,大田原,日本)。由三名独立的检查者评估总共120帧静态图像,60幅THI的B模式扫描图像和60幅FC扫描图像,他们使用既定标准(BI-RADS分类)以1至5的等级确定病变的存在情况。每种技术的图像质量按-2(FC明显优于THI)、-1(FC略优于THI)、0(相同)、+1(THI略优于FC)至+2(THI明显优于FC)的等级进行评分。使用Mann Whitney U检验和ROC分析,就图像质量和诊断准确性对不同的超声技术进行比较。
图像质量结果如下:-0.56±0.71。在56%的图像中FC优于THI,两种技术在37%的病例中相同,仅7%的病例中THI优于FC。计算出以下曲线下面积(AUC,病变存在情况):THI和FC分别为0.945和0.969(无显著差异)。两种超声技术具有相当的敏感性(FC/THI分别为100/98%)和特异性(FC/THI分别为76/74%)。
总体而言,FC的诊断价值与THI相当,仅有细微差异。对于乳腺病变的超声检查,FC可提高图像质量和病变的清晰度。