Erana-Rojas Irma E, Barboza-Quintana Alvaro, Ayala Alberto G, Fuller Gregory N
Department of Pathology, Hospital San Jose-Tec de Monterrey, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.
Ann Diagn Pathol. 2002 Oct;6(5):265-71. doi: 10.1053/adpa.2002.35737.
Demyelinating disease presenting as a solitary contrast-enhancing mass poses a diagnostic challenge for both radiologists and surgical pathologists. We report the cases of two female patients, aged 23 and 37 years, who exhibited the clinical and radiologic features of a space-occupying mass strongly suggestive of neoplasia. In both patients, magnetic resonance imaging showed a ring-enhancing parietal lesion. Intraoperative frozen sections in both patients displayed histologic features strongly suggestive of a glial neoplasm, including marked hypercellularity, a prominent astrocytic component, and easily identifiable mitotic figures. However, permanent sections showed additional and helpful histologic findings that included Creutzfeldt astrocytes and granular mitoses. Subsequent immunostaining showed that the hypercellularity was principally caused by macrophage infiltration (HAM-56 and CD68) and an associated reactive astrocytosis (glial fibrillary acidic protein). Additional confirmatory tests included special stains for myelin (Luxol-fast-blue), which demonstrated focal, sharply marginated loss of myelin, and for axons (silver stain for axons and neurofilament protein immunohistochemistry), which showed relative preservation of axons in areas of myelin loss. Together, the special stains confirmed the demyelinating nature of the lesions. The keys to avoiding misdiagnosing a demyelinating pseudotumor as a diffuse glioma include a general awareness of this potential pitfall, including the radiologic appearance of demyelinating pseudotumors as contrast-enhancing solitary masses that mimic tumor; knowledge of the characteristic histologic features, including Creutzfeldt astrocytes and granular mitoses; and a high index of suspicion for macrophage infiltration combined with a willingness to use appropriate confirmatory immunohistochemical studies in suspicious or uncertain cases. This approach will minimize the chance of misdiagnosis and subsequent use of inappropriate and deleterious therapies.
表现为孤立性强化肿块的脱髓鞘疾病对放射科医生和外科病理学家来说都是一个诊断挑战。我们报告了两名女性患者的病例,年龄分别为23岁和37岁,她们表现出占位性肿块的临床和放射学特征,强烈提示为肿瘤。两名患者的磁共振成像均显示顶叶环形强化病变。两名患者的术中冰冻切片显示出强烈提示为胶质肿瘤的组织学特征,包括明显的细胞增多、突出的星形细胞成分和易于识别的有丝分裂象。然而,永久切片显示了额外且有帮助的组织学发现,包括克雅氏星形细胞和颗粒状有丝分裂。随后的免疫染色显示,细胞增多主要是由巨噬细胞浸润(HAM-56和CD68)和相关的反应性星形细胞增生(胶质纤维酸性蛋白)引起的。其他确证性检查包括髓鞘特殊染色(卢氏固蓝),显示局灶性、边界清晰的髓鞘缺失,以及轴突特殊染色(轴突银染和神经丝蛋白免疫组化),显示在髓鞘缺失区域轴突相对保留。这些特殊染色共同证实了病变的脱髓鞘性质。避免将脱髓鞘假瘤误诊为弥漫性胶质瘤的关键包括:对这一潜在陷阱有总体认识,包括脱髓鞘假瘤作为模仿肿瘤的强化孤立性肿块的放射学表现;了解特征性组织学特征,包括克雅氏星形细胞和颗粒状有丝分裂;对巨噬细胞浸润有高度怀疑指数,并愿意在可疑或不确定病例中使用适当的确证性免疫组化研究。这种方法将最大限度地减少误诊以及随后使用不适当和有害治疗的可能性。