Suppr超能文献

美国主要死亡率数据库入门与比较综述

A primer and comparative review of major US mortality databases.

作者信息

Cowper Diane C, Kubal Joseph D, Maynard Charles, Hynes Denise M

机构信息

Veterans Affairs Information Resource Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Health Service Research and Development Service Resource Center at the Edward Hines, Jr, Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines, IL 60141-5000, USA.

出版信息

Ann Epidemiol. 2002 Oct;12(7):462-8. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(01)00285-x.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Mortality data are important tools for research requiring vital status information. We reviewed the major mortality databases and mortality ascertainment services available in the United States, including the National Death Index (NDI), the Social Security Administration (SSA) files, and the Department of Veterans Affairs databases.

METHODS

The content, reliability, and accuracy of mortality sources are described and compared. We also describe how investigators can gain access to these resources and provide further contact information.

RESULTS

We reviewed the accuracy of major mortality sources. The sensitivity (i.e., the proportion of the true number of deaths) of the NDI ranged from 87.0% to 97.9%, whereas the sensitivity for the VA Beneficiary Identification and Records Locator System (BIRLS) ranged between 80.0% and 94.5%. The sensitivity of SSA files ranged between 83.0% and 83.6%. Sensitivity for the VA Patient Treatment File (PTF) was 33%.

CONCLUSIONS

While several national mortality ascertainment services are available for vital status (i.e., death) analyses, the NDI information demonstrated the highest sensitivity and, currently, it is the only source at the national level with a cause of death field useful for research purposes. Researchers must consider methods used to ascertain vital status as well as the quality of the information in mortality databases.

摘要

目的

死亡率数据是需要生命状态信息的研究的重要工具。我们回顾了美国现有的主要死亡率数据库和死亡率确定服务,包括国家死亡指数(NDI)、社会保障管理局(SSA)档案以及退伍军人事务部数据库。

方法

描述并比较了死亡率数据源的内容、可靠性和准确性。我们还描述了研究人员如何获取这些资源并提供了进一步的联系信息。

结果

我们回顾了主要死亡率数据源的准确性。NDI的灵敏度(即死亡真实人数的比例)在87.0%至97.9%之间,而退伍军人事务部受益人识别和记录定位系统(BIRLS)的灵敏度在80.0%至94.5%之间。SSA档案的灵敏度在83.0%至83.6%之间。退伍军人事务部患者治疗档案(PTF)的灵敏度为33%。

结论

虽然有几种国家死亡率确定服务可用于生命状态(即死亡)分析,但NDI信息显示出最高的灵敏度,目前,它是国家层面唯一具有可用于研究目的的死亡原因字段的数据源。研究人员必须考虑用于确定生命状态的方法以及死亡率数据库中信息的质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验