• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国主要死亡率数据库入门与比较综述

A primer and comparative review of major US mortality databases.

作者信息

Cowper Diane C, Kubal Joseph D, Maynard Charles, Hynes Denise M

机构信息

Veterans Affairs Information Resource Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Health Service Research and Development Service Resource Center at the Edward Hines, Jr, Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines, IL 60141-5000, USA.

出版信息

Ann Epidemiol. 2002 Oct;12(7):462-8. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(01)00285-x.

DOI:10.1016/s1047-2797(01)00285-x
PMID:12377423
Abstract

PURPOSE

Mortality data are important tools for research requiring vital status information. We reviewed the major mortality databases and mortality ascertainment services available in the United States, including the National Death Index (NDI), the Social Security Administration (SSA) files, and the Department of Veterans Affairs databases.

METHODS

The content, reliability, and accuracy of mortality sources are described and compared. We also describe how investigators can gain access to these resources and provide further contact information.

RESULTS

We reviewed the accuracy of major mortality sources. The sensitivity (i.e., the proportion of the true number of deaths) of the NDI ranged from 87.0% to 97.9%, whereas the sensitivity for the VA Beneficiary Identification and Records Locator System (BIRLS) ranged between 80.0% and 94.5%. The sensitivity of SSA files ranged between 83.0% and 83.6%. Sensitivity for the VA Patient Treatment File (PTF) was 33%.

CONCLUSIONS

While several national mortality ascertainment services are available for vital status (i.e., death) analyses, the NDI information demonstrated the highest sensitivity and, currently, it is the only source at the national level with a cause of death field useful for research purposes. Researchers must consider methods used to ascertain vital status as well as the quality of the information in mortality databases.

摘要

目的

死亡率数据是需要生命状态信息的研究的重要工具。我们回顾了美国现有的主要死亡率数据库和死亡率确定服务,包括国家死亡指数(NDI)、社会保障管理局(SSA)档案以及退伍军人事务部数据库。

方法

描述并比较了死亡率数据源的内容、可靠性和准确性。我们还描述了研究人员如何获取这些资源并提供了进一步的联系信息。

结果

我们回顾了主要死亡率数据源的准确性。NDI的灵敏度(即死亡真实人数的比例)在87.0%至97.9%之间,而退伍军人事务部受益人识别和记录定位系统(BIRLS)的灵敏度在80.0%至94.5%之间。SSA档案的灵敏度在83.0%至83.6%之间。退伍军人事务部患者治疗档案(PTF)的灵敏度为33%。

结论

虽然有几种国家死亡率确定服务可用于生命状态(即死亡)分析,但NDI信息显示出最高的灵敏度,目前,它是国家层面唯一具有可用于研究目的的死亡原因字段的数据源。研究人员必须考虑用于确定生命状态的方法以及死亡率数据库中信息的质量。

相似文献

1
A primer and comparative review of major US mortality databases.美国主要死亡率数据库入门与比较综述
Ann Epidemiol. 2002 Oct;12(7):462-8. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(01)00285-x.
2
Mortality ascertainment of women veterans: a comparison of sources of vital status information, 1979-2002.女性退伍军人的死亡率确定:1979 - 2002年生命状态信息来源的比较
Med Care. 2009 Jan;47(1):125-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181809125.
3
Mortality ascertainment in the veteran population: alternatives to the National Death Index.退伍军人人口中的死亡率确定:国家死亡指数的替代方法。
Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Feb 1;141(3):242-50. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117426.
4
Vital status ascertainment through the files of the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Social Security Administration.通过退伍军人事务部和社会保障管理局的档案确定生命状态。
Ann Epidemiol. 1996 Mar;6(2):102-9. doi: 10.1016/1047-2797(95)00126-3.
5
Accuracy and completeness of mortality data in the Department of Veterans Affairs.美国退伍军人事务部死亡率数据的准确性和完整性。
Popul Health Metr. 2006 Apr 10;4:2. doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-4-2.
6
Obtaining vital status and cause of death on a million persons.获取 100 万人的生命状态和死因。
Int J Radiat Biol. 2022;98(4):580-586. doi: 10.1080/09553002.2018.1539884. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
7
Identifying deaths before 1979 using the Social Security Administration Death Master File.利用社会保障管理局死亡主文件识别1979年以前的死亡情况。
Epidemiology. 1997 May;8(3):321-3. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199705000-00017.
8
Ascertainment of mortality in the U.S. veteran population: World War II veteran twins.美国退伍军人人口死亡率的确定:二战退伍军人双胞胎。
Mil Med. 1995 Jul;160(7):351-5.
9
Assessment of vital status in Department of Veterans Affairs national databases. comparison with state death certificates.美国退伍军人事务部国家数据库中的生命状态评估。与州死亡证明的比较。
Ann Epidemiol. 2001 Jul;11(5):286-91. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(01)00211-3.
10
A comparison of the National Death Index and Social Security Administration databases to ascertain vital status.比较国家死亡指数和社会保障管理局数据库以确定生命状态。
Epidemiology. 2001 Mar;12(2):259-61. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200103000-00021.

引用本文的文献

1
A randomized controlled trial of meditation and health education on carotid intima-media thickness and major adverse cardiovascular events in Black men and women.一项关于冥想与健康教育对黑种男性和女性颈动脉内膜中层厚度及主要不良心血管事件影响的随机对照试验。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Mar 19;12:1513699. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1513699. eCollection 2025.
2
Antihypertensive Deprescribing and Cardiovascular Events Among Long-Term Care Residents.降压药物停用与长期护理居民中心血管事件。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2446851. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46851.
3
Patient characteristics and health system encounters of decedents not marked deceased in the electronic health record.
电子健康记录中未标记为已故者的患者特征及医疗系统接触情况。
JAMIA Open. 2024 Oct 29;7(4):ooae121. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae121. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Risk Factors for Natural Cause Mortality in Schizophrenia.精神分裂症自然死因死亡率的危险因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2432401. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32401.
5
Radiodensities of Skeletal Muscle and Visceral Adipose Tissues Are Prognostic Factors in Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.骨骼肌和内脏脂肪组织的放射性密度是透明细胞肾细胞癌的预后因素。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 Oct 2;33(10):1375-1382. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0306.
6
Contribution of Potentially Inappropriate Medications to Polypharmacy-Associated Risk of Mortality in Middle-Aged Patients: A National Cohort Study.潜在不适当用药对中年患者多重用药相关死亡风险的影响:一项全国队列研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Dec;39(16):3261-3270. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08817-4. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
7
Development, validation, and transportability of several machine-learned, non-exercise-based VO prediction models for older adults.发展、验证和可移植性几种基于机器学习的、非运动的老年人 VO 预测模型。
J Sport Health Sci. 2024 Sep;13(5):611-620. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2024.02.004. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
8
Trends in All-Cause, Cardiovascular, and Noncardiovascular Mortality Among US Adults With Hypertension.美国高血压成年人全因、心血管和非心血管死亡率趋势。
Hypertension. 2024 May;81(5):1055-1064. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.22220. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
9
Restricted carbohydrate diets below 45% energy are not associated with risk of mortality in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2018.在1999年至2018年的美国国家健康与营养检查调查中,能量占比低于45%的低碳水化合物饮食与死亡风险无关。
Front Nutr. 2024 Feb 5;11:1225674. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1225674. eCollection 2024.
10
Gestational diabetes mellitus and risk of long-term all-cause and cardiac mortality: a prospective cohort study.妊娠期糖尿病与长期全因和心脏死亡率的关系:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024 Feb 1;23(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02131-3.