Suppr超能文献

小细胞肺癌化疗剂量与剂量强度分析:可吸取的经验教训

An analysis of chemotherapy dose and dose-intensity in small-cell lung cancer: lessons to be drawn.

作者信息

Tjan-Heijnen V C G, Wagener D J T, Postmus P E

机构信息

University Medical Center Nijmegen, Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2002 Oct;13(10):1519-30. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf249.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The survival in untreated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is <3 months. Prognosis has improved with chemotherapy, but remains poor. One of the issues concerning current chemotherapy is whether there is any benefit of increasing chemotherapy dose or dose intensity (DI).

DESIGN

In the present review, 20 randomised studies, published in the period 1980-2001, in which dose or DI of chemotherapy in SCLC were the only variables tested, are analysed. The studies were categorised as follows: (i) number of cycles (treatment duration); (ii) dose per cycle; (iii) interval between cycles (dose densification); and (iv) a combination of these variables.

RESULTS

(i) With treatment duration reduced to three to six cycles, median survival time (MST) was 2 months shorter, most evident in patients showing a (complete) response to initial chemotherapy. (ii) An improved survival was observed in two out of five high-dose studies. (iii) Survival was increased by 0.6 to 6.2 months in all four densification studies. (iv) Survival was not improved in studies that used dose-escalation and/or -densification in combination with a reduced number of cycles. The sample sizes were too small to be conclusive in most of the individual trials. The median of the MSTs in the 20 trials taken together was 9.8 months for the standard arms and 11.5 months for the intensified arms (i.e. more cycles, higher dose per cycle and/or shorter intervals). After omitting the two trials with reduced number of cycles in the so-called 'high-dose' arm, the median of MSTs was 8.7 and 11.5 months, respectively. There was only a slight improvement (1%) in 2-year survival for all trials taken together. However, when only taking high-dose and dose-densified chemotherapy trials into account, the difference in median 2-year survival became 19% (12% versus 31%).

CONCLUSIONS

The above classification facilitates our understanding about doses of chemotherapy and it makes us appreciate the relevance of the individual determinants. It appears that the number of cycles, dose level, dose density, cumulative dose and DI are all important factors for improving survival. Intensification of chemotherapy still deserves further research in SCLC.

摘要

背景

未经治疗的小细胞肺癌(SCLC)患者生存期不足3个月。化疗改善了预后,但仍然较差。当前化疗的问题之一是增加化疗剂量或剂量强度(DI)是否有任何益处。

设计

在本综述中,分析了1980年至2001年期间发表的20项随机研究,这些研究中SCLC化疗的剂量或DI是唯一测试变量。研究分类如下:(i)周期数(治疗持续时间);(ii)每个周期的剂量;(iii)周期之间的间隔(剂量密集);(iv)这些变量的组合。

结果

(i)治疗持续时间缩短至三到六个周期时,中位生存时间(MST)缩短2个月,这在对初始化疗有(完全)反应的患者中最为明显。(ii)五项高剂量研究中有两项观察到生存期改善。(iii)在所有四项密集研究中,生存期延长了0.6至6.2个月。(iv)在将剂量递增和/或密集与减少周期数相结合的研究中,生存期未改善。大多数个体试验的样本量太小,无法得出结论。20项试验的标准组MST中位数为9.8个月,强化组为11.5个月(即更多周期、每个周期更高剂量和/或更短间隔)。在所谓“高剂量”组中省略两项周期数减少的试验后,MST中位数分别为8.7个月和11.5个月。所有试验的2年生存率仅略有改善(1%)。然而,仅考虑高剂量和剂量密集化疗试验时,2年中位生存率差异变为19%(12%对31%)。

结论

上述分类有助于我们理解化疗剂量,并使我们认识到各个决定因素的相关性。似乎周期数、剂量水平、剂量密度、累积剂量和DI都是改善生存的重要因素。SCLC化疗强化仍值得进一步研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验