Ge S J, Zhuang X L, Wang Y T, Wang Z D, Li H T
Department of Anaesthesiology, Shanghai First People's Hospital, Shanghai 200080, China.
Br J Anaesth. 2002 Aug;89(2):260-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/aef187.
The bispectral index (BIS) and the rapidly extracted auditory evoked potentials index (A-line ARX Index or AAI) have been proposed as methods to measure the depth of sedation. A prospective study was designed to assess the performance of both these methods for measuring the depth of sedation induced by propofol or midazolam under epidural block.
Thirty-two ASA I and II adult patients undergoing elective gynaecological surgery under low-thoracolumbar epidural block were studied. Eighteen patients received propofol (Group P: 20 mg bolus every 3 min) and 14 received midazolam (Group M: 0.5 mg bolus every 5 min) until an observer's assessment of alertness/sedation (OAA/S) scale score of 1 was achieved. AAI and BIS were monitored for different OAA/S scores.
AAI and BIS decreased and increased following the changes on the patients' OAA/S scores and correlated with sedation significantly. During the onset phase, the coefficients of Spearman's rank correlation for AAI and BIS were respectively 0.958 and 0.898 (P < 0.001) for Group P, and 0.973 and 0.945 (P < 0.001) for Group M. During the recovery phase in Group P, the coefficients were respectively 0.946 and 0.702 (P < 0.001). Linear regression analysis showed that both AAI and BIS were linearly related to the OAA/S scores. The coefficients of Spearman's rank correlation and linear regression for AAI were all greater than those for BIS (P < 0.05).
Both AAI and BIS correlated well with the depth of sedation induced by propofol or midazolam under epidural block. AAI may be more valuable when monitoring depth of sedation.
双谱指数(BIS)和快速提取听觉诱发电位指数(A线ARX指数或AAI)已被提议作为测量镇静深度的方法。一项前瞻性研究旨在评估这两种方法在硬膜外阻滞下测量丙泊酚或咪达唑仑诱导的镇静深度的性能。
研究了32例接受低胸腰段硬膜外阻滞下择期妇科手术的ASA I和II级成年患者。18例患者接受丙泊酚(P组:每3分钟静脉推注20mg),14例接受咪达唑仑(M组:每5分钟静脉推注0.5mg),直至观察者评估的警觉/镇静(OAA/S)量表评分为1。监测不同OAA/S评分时的AAI和BIS。
AAI和BIS随着患者OAA/S评分的变化而降低和升高,与镇静程度显著相关。在诱导期,P组AAI和BIS的Spearman等级相关系数分别为0.958和0.898(P<0.001),M组分别为0.973和0.945(P<0.001)。在P组的恢复期,相关系数分别为0.946和0.702(P<0.001)。线性回归分析表明,AAI和BIS均与OAA/S评分呈线性相关。AAI的Spearman等级相关系数和线性回归系数均大于BIS(P<0.05)。
在硬膜外阻滞下,AAI和BIS均与丙泊酚或咪达唑仑诱导的镇静深度密切相关。在监测镇静深度时,AAI可能更有价值。