Kokis Judite V, Macpherson Robyn, Toplak Maggie E, West Richard F, Stanovich Keith E
University of Toronto, M5S 1V6, Ont, Canada.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2002 Sep;83(1):26-52. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0965(02)00121-2.
Developmental and individual differences in the tendency to favor analytic responses over heuristic responses were examined in children of two different ages (10- and 11-year-olds versus 13-year-olds), and of widely varying cognitive ability. Three tasks were examined that all required analytic processing to override heuristic processing: inductive reasoning, deductive reasoning under conditions of belief bias, and probabilistic reasoning. Significant increases in analytic responding with development were observed on the first two tasks. Cognitive ability was associated with analytic responding on all three tasks. Cognitive style measures such as actively open-minded thinking and need for cognition explained variance in analytic responding on the tasks after variance shared with cognitive ability had been controlled. The implications for dual-process theories of cognition and cognitive development are discussed.
研究了两个不同年龄段(10至11岁儿童与13岁儿童)且认知能力差异很大的儿童在倾向于选择分析性反应而非启发性反应方面的发展差异和个体差异。研究了三项任务,所有这些任务都需要进行分析性处理以超越启发性处理:归纳推理、信念偏差条件下的演绎推理以及概率推理。在前两项任务中观察到,随着发展,分析性反应显著增加。认知能力与所有三项任务中的分析性反应相关。在控制了与认知能力共享的方差后,诸如积极开放思维和认知需求等认知风格指标解释了任务中分析性反应的方差。讨论了对认知和认知发展的双过程理论的启示。