Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA.
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2023 Oct;51(10):1497-1509. doi: 10.1007/s10802-023-01080-x. Epub 2023 May 26.
Greater sensitivity to the cost of effortful engagement has long been implicated in the development of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). The current study evaluated preferential choice to engage in demanding tasks, and did so in combination with computational methods to interrogate the process of choice. Children aged 8-12 with (n = 49) and without (n = 36) ADHD were administered the cognitive effort discounting paradigm (COG-ED, adapted from Westbrook et al., 2013). Diffusion modelling was subsequently applied to the choice data to allow for a better description of the process of affective decision making. All children showed evidence of effort discounting, but, contrary to theoretical expectations, there was no evidence that children with ADHD judged effortful tasks to be lower in subjective value, or that they maintained a bias towards less effortful tasks. However, children with ADHD developed a much less differentiated mental representation of demand than their non-ADHD counterparts even though familiarity with and exposure to the experience of effort was similar between groups. Thus, despite theoretical arguments to the contrary, and colloquial use of motivational constructs to explain ADHD-related behavior, our findings strongly argue against the presence of greater sensitivity to costs of effort or reduced sensitivity to rewards as an explanatory mechanism. Instead, there appears to be a more global weakness in the metacognitive monitoring of demand, which is a critical precursor for cost-benefit analyses that underlie decisions to engage cognitive control.
长期以来,人们一直认为对努力投入成本的敏感性增加与注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的发展有关。本研究评估了参与高要求任务的优先选择,并结合计算方法来探究选择过程。8-12 岁的 ADHD 儿童(n=49)和非 ADHD 儿童(n=36)接受了认知努力折扣范式(COG-ED,改编自 Westbrook 等人,2013 年)。随后对选择数据进行了扩散建模,以更好地描述情感决策过程。所有儿童都表现出努力折扣的证据,但与理论预期相反,没有证据表明 ADHD 儿童认为费力的任务主观价值较低,或者他们倾向于选择不那么费力的任务。然而,ADHD 儿童的需求心理表征比非 ADHD 儿童分化得少得多,尽管两组儿童对努力的熟悉程度和体验相似。因此,尽管存在理论上的争议,以及使用动机结构来解释 ADHD 相关行为的通俗用法,但我们的研究结果强烈反对存在更高的努力成本敏感性或降低的奖励敏感性作为解释机制。相反,在需求的元认知监测方面似乎存在更普遍的弱点,这是进行成本效益分析的关键前提,而成本效益分析是决定是否进行认知控制的基础。