Shuval Judith T, Mizrachi Nissim, Smetannikov Emma
School of Public Health, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.
Soc Sci Med. 2002 Nov;55(10):1745-55. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00305-7.
There is a growing evidence that alternative health care practitioners and physicians are working together in collaborative patterns. The paper examines these collaborative patterns in hospital settings in Israel. On the theoretical level, the specific issues relate to theories concerning relationships between dominant institutional structures which enjoy the benefits of epistemological legitimacy as well as extensive, supportive social structures and groups of non-conformists who seek to attain many of the same goals by utilizing different methods based on other epistemologies. In the most general sense, the issues involved concern processes of accommodation and social change. Data were collected by means of semi-structured, qualitative interviews in four general hospitals in Jerusalem during 2000. Nineteen persons were interviewed including 10 alternative practitioners working in a variety of fields and nine biomedical practitioners who worked with them (six physicians and three nurses). Interviews focused on background and training, reasons for entry into the hospital, length of practice, status in the hospital system, mode of remuneration, content of work, modes of interaction with others in the hospital and problems encountered. The findings suggest a dual process of simultaneous acceptance and marginalization of alternative practitioners. While small numbers of alternative practitioners were found to be practicing in a wide variety of hospital departments and in a broad spectrum of specialties, they were in no way accepted as regular staff members and their marginality was made clear by a variety of visible structural, symbolic and geographical cues. There is a division of labour expressed by focusing on the biomedical practitioners on the diagnosis and treatment of specific disease entities, while the alternative practitioners work in the illness context, concentrating of feelings and affective states involving the alleviation of pain, suffering and efforts to improve the quality of life.
越来越多的证据表明,替代医疗从业者和医生正以合作模式共同工作。本文研究了以色列医院环境中的这些合作模式。在理论层面,具体问题涉及到有关主导性机构结构之间关系的理论,这些结构享有认识论合法性的益处以及广泛的支持性社会结构,还有那些寻求通过基于其他认识论的不同方法实现许多相同目标的不墨守成规者群体。最一般意义上,所涉及的问题关乎调适和社会变革的过程。2000年期间,通过在耶路撒冷的四家综合医院进行半结构化的定性访谈收集了数据。共采访了19人,包括10名在各个领域工作的替代医疗从业者以及9名与他们共事的生物医学从业者(6名医生和3名护士)。访谈聚焦于背景和培训、进入医院的原因、从业时长、在医院系统中的地位、薪酬模式、工作内容、在医院与他人的互动方式以及遇到的问题。研究结果表明替代医疗从业者同时面临被接纳和被边缘化的双重过程。虽然发现少数替代医疗从业者在各种各样的医院科室和广泛的专科领域执业,但他们根本没有被接纳为正式员工,而且他们的边缘地位通过各种明显的结构、象征和地理线索得以彰显。存在一种分工,生物医学从业者专注于特定疾病实体的诊断和治疗,而替代医疗从业者在疾病背景下工作,专注于涉及减轻疼痛、痛苦以及努力提高生活质量的感受和情感状态。