Suppr超能文献

中耳炎治疗中的细菌清除

Bacterial eradication in the treatment of otitis media.

作者信息

Dagan Ron, Leibovitz Eugene

机构信息

Pediatric Infectious Disease Unit, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

出版信息

Lancet Infect Dis. 2002 Oct;2(10):593-604. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(02)00394-8.

Abstract

Drugs differ in their ability to eradicate various pathogens from the middle-ear cavity during acute otitis media (AOM), and these differences clearly affect clinical outcome. Outcome is derived from differences in the association between concentrations of the drugs at the site of infection and the antimicrobial effect (termed pharmacodynamics). These differences are even more marked in the present era of antimicrobial resistance. However, since AOM is a self-limiting disease in most cases, difference in clinical outcome is more difficult to ascertain than that of bacteriological outcome, which is measured within 3-5 days. A favourable clinical outcome regardless of the bacteriological effect of the drug can result in false optimism when less-effective antibiotic drugs are used. Inappropriate study design and manipulation of clinical results add to this confusion. In this review we attempt to highlight the evidence regarding bacteriological response to antibiotics in AOM and to draw attention to potential flaws that may mislead clinicians.

摘要

在急性中耳炎(AOM)期间,不同药物清除中耳腔各种病原体的能力存在差异,这些差异明显影响临床结局。结局源于感染部位药物浓度与抗菌效果之间关联的差异(称为药效学)。在当前抗菌药物耐药时代,这些差异更为显著。然而,由于AOM在大多数情况下是一种自限性疾病,与在3 - 5天内测量的细菌学结局相比,临床结局的差异更难确定。当使用效果较差的抗生素药物时,无论药物的细菌学效果如何,良好的临床结局都可能导致错误的乐观情绪。不恰当的研究设计和对临床结果的操纵加剧了这种混乱。在本综述中,我们试图突出关于AOM中抗生素细菌学反应的证据,并提请注意可能误导临床医生的潜在缺陷。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验