Suppr超能文献

腰椎X线摄影在基层医疗腰痛患者中的成本效益分析

Cost-effectiveness of lumbar spine radiography in primary care patients with low back pain.

作者信息

Miller Paul, Kendrick Denise, Bentley Elaine, Fielding Katherine

机构信息

School of Economics and Trent Institute for Health Services Research, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Oct 15;27(20):2291-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200210150-00021.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Fifty-two practices in the East Midlands, United Kingdom, were included.

OBJECTIVES

To test the hypothesis that referral for lumbar spine radiography is cost-effective in primary care patients with low back pain of at least 6 weeks' duration compared with usual care in which referral is not routine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Lumbar spine radiography is commonly used in the management of low back pain, although the yield of findings that alter clinical management is low. Evidence is needed on the cost-effectiveness of lumbar spine radiographs in patients with low back pain.

METHODS

A prospective economic analysis alongside a randomized controlled trial was used. Outcomes included the Roland disability score, pain, health status scale, EuroQol, satisfaction, direct health care costs (primary, secondary, and community care; prescribed and over-the-counter medicines; special equipment), and indirect costs (informal care, extra expenses, welfare benefits, loss of earnings and productivity). RESULTS A total of 210 participants were randomly assigned to lumbar spine radiography, and 211, to usual care. At 9 months' postrandomization, no difference between the groups was found in any health outcomes other than satisfaction. The intervention group had a higher overall satisfaction score (21 19, < 0.01). The intervention group had higher direct costs (150 pounds sterling vs 109 pounds sterling, < 0.01). Cost-effectiveness analysis shows that patient satisfaction can be increased using lumbar radiography but at an additional cost (point estimate 20 pounds sterling per point on satisfaction scale). The simulated distribution based on trial data shows that only when a 1-point increase in satisfaction is valued at more than 50 pounds sterling can it be claimed that radiography is cost-effective in these terms (incremental net monetary benefit mean = 116 pounds sterling, 95% CI pound 7, 225 pounds sterling).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiography is likely to be cost-effective only when satisfaction is valued relatively highly. Strategies to enhance satisfaction for patients with low back pain without using lumbar radiography should be pursued.

摘要

研究设计

纳入了英国东米德兰兹郡的52家医疗机构。

目的

检验以下假设,即对于持续至少6周的腰痛初级保健患者,与不进行常规转诊的常规护理相比,转诊进行腰椎X线摄影具有成本效益。

背景数据总结

腰椎X线摄影常用于腰痛的治疗,尽管改变临床治疗的检查结果阳性率较低。需要有证据证明腰椎X线摄影对腰痛患者的成本效益。

方法

采用前瞻性经济分析并结合随机对照试验。结果包括罗兰残疾评分、疼痛、健康状况量表、欧洲五维度健康量表、满意度、直接医疗费用(初级、二级和社区护理;处方药和非处方药;特殊设备)以及间接费用(非正式护理、额外费用、福利津贴、收入和生产力损失)。结果:共有210名参与者被随机分配接受腰椎X线摄影,211名接受常规护理。随机分组后9个月,除满意度外,两组在任何健康结果方面均未发现差异。干预组的总体满意度得分更高(21比19,P<0.01)。干预组的直接费用更高(150英镑对109英镑,P<0.01)。成本效益分析表明,使用腰椎X线摄影可以提高患者满意度,但需额外成本(满意度量表上每提高1分的点估计成本为20英镑)。基于试验数据的模拟分布表明,只有当满意度提高1分时价值超过50英镑,才能声称从这些方面来看X线摄影具有成本效益(增量净货币效益均值=116英镑,95%可信区间为-7英镑至225英镑)。

结论

只有当满意度被赋予相对较高的价值时,X线摄影才可能具有成本效益。应寻求在不使用腰椎X线摄影的情况下提高腰痛患者满意度的策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验