BMJ. 2004 Dec 11;329(7479):1381. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38282.607859.AE. Epub 2004 Nov 19.
To assess the cost effectiveness of adding spinal manipulation, exercise classes, or manipulation followed by exercise ("combined treatment") to "best care" in general practice for patients consulting with low back pain.
Stochastic cost utility analysis alongside pragmatic randomised trial with factorial design.
181 general practices and 63 community settings for physical treatments around 14 centres across the United Kingdom.
1287 (96%) of 1334 trial participants.
Healthcare costs, quality adjusted life years (QALYs), and cost per QALY over 12 months.
Over one year, mean treatment costs relative to "best care" were 195 pounds sterling (360 dollars; 279 euros; 95% credibility interval 85 pounds sterling to 308 pounds sterling) for manipulation, 140 pounds sterling (3 pounds sterling to 278 pounds sterling) for exercise, and 125 pounds sterling (21 pounds sterling to 228 pounds sterling) for combined treatment. All three active treatments increased participants' average QALYs compared with best care alone. Each extra QALY that combined treatment yielded relative to best care cost 3800 pounds sterling; in economic terms it had an "incremental cost effectiveness ratio" of 3800 pounds sterling. Manipulation alone had a ratio of 8700 pounds sterling relative to combined treatment. If the NHS was prepared to pay at least 10,000 pounds sterling for each extra QALY (lower than previous recommendations in the United Kingdom), manipulation alone would probably be the best strategy. If manipulation was not available, exercise would have an incremental cost effectiveness ratio of 8300 pounds sterling relative to best care.
Spinal manipulation is a cost effective addition to "best care" for back pain in general practice. Manipulation alone probably gives better value for money than manipulation followed by exercise.
评估在全科医疗中,针对因腰痛前来咨询的患者,在“最佳护理”基础上增加脊柱推拿、运动课程或先推拿后运动(“联合治疗”)的成本效益。
随机成本效用分析以及采用析因设计的实用随机试验。
英国14个中心周边的181家全科诊所和63个社区理疗机构。
1334名试验参与者中的1287名(96%)。
医疗费用、质量调整生命年(QALYs)以及12个月内的每QALY成本。
在一年时间里,相对于“最佳护理”,推拿的平均治疗成本为195英镑(360美元;279欧元;95%可信区间为85英镑至308英镑),运动课程为140英镑(3英镑至278英镑),联合治疗为125英镑(21英镑至228英镑)。与单纯的最佳护理相比,所有三种积极治疗方法均提高了参与者的平均QALYs。联合治疗相对于最佳护理每多产生一个QALY的成本为3800英镑;从经济角度来看,其“增量成本效益比”为3800英镑。相对于联合治疗,单纯推拿的比值为8700英镑。如果英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)愿意为每个额外的QALY至少支付10000英镑(低于英国此前的建议),那么单纯推拿可能是最佳策略。如果无法进行推拿,运动相对于最佳护理的增量成本效益比为8300英镑。
在全科医疗中,脊柱推拿是腰痛“最佳护理”的一种具有成本效益的补充。单纯推拿可能比先推拿后运动性价比更高。