Verrier Bernard, Le Grand Roger, Ataman-Onal Yasemin, Terrat Celine, Guillon Christophe, Durand Pierre-Yves, Hurtrel Bruno, Aubertin Anne-Marie, Sutter Gerd, Erfle Volker, Girard Marc
UMR 2142 CNRS-BioMérieux, ENSL, 69365 Lyon, France.
DNA Cell Biol. 2002 Sep;21(9):653-8. doi: 10.1089/104454902760330183.
Recent evidence suggests that a CD8-mediated cytotoxic T-cell response against the regulatory proteins of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) may control infection after pathogenic virus challenge. Here, we evaluated whether vaccination with Tat or Tat and Rev could significantly reduce viral load in nonhuman primates. Rhesus macaques were primed with Semliki forest Virus (SFV) expressing HIV-1 tat (SFV-tat) and HIV-1 rev (SFV-rev) and boosted with modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) expressing tat and rev. A second group of monkey was primed with SFV-tat only and boosted with MVA-tat. A third group received a tat and rev DNA/MVA prime-boost vaccine regimen. Monitoring of anti-Tat and anti-Rev antibody responses or antigen-specific IFN-gamma production, as measured by enzyme-linked immunospot assays revealed no clear differences between the three groups. These results suggest that priming with either DNA or SFV seemed to be equivalent, but the additive or synergistic effect of a rev vaccine could not be clearly established. The animals were challenged by the rectal route 9 weeks after the last booster immunization, using 10 MID(50) of a SHIV-BX08 stock. Postchallenge follow-up of the monkeys included testing seroconversion to Gag and Env antigens, measuring virus infectivity in PBMC by cocultivation with noninfected human cells, and monitoring of plasma viral load. None of the animals was protected from infection as assessed by PCR, but peak viremia was reduced more than 200-fold compared to sham controls in one third (6/18) of vaccinated macaques, whatever the vaccine regimen they received. Interestingly, among these six protected animals four did not seroconvert. Altogether, these results clearly indicated that the addition of early HIV proteins like Tat and Rev in a multicomponent preventive vaccine including structural proteins like Env or Gag may be beneficial in preventive vaccinal strategies.
最近有证据表明,针对人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)或猿猴免疫缺陷病毒(SIV)调节蛋白的CD8介导的细胞毒性T细胞反应可能在致病性病毒攻击后控制感染。在此,我们评估了用Tat或Tat与Rev进行疫苗接种是否能显著降低非人灵长类动物的病毒载量。恒河猴先用表达HIV-1 tat(SFV-tat)和HIV-1 rev(SFV-rev)的Semliki森林病毒(SFV)进行初免,然后用表达tat和rev的改良安卡拉痘苗病毒(MVA)进行加强免疫。第二组猴子仅用SFV-tat进行初免,并用MVA-tat进行加强免疫。第三组接受tat和rev DNA/MVA初免-加强疫苗方案。通过酶联免疫斑点试验监测抗Tat和抗Rev抗体反应或抗原特异性IFN-γ产生,结果显示三组之间没有明显差异。这些结果表明,用DNA或SFV进行初免似乎是等效的,但Rev疫苗的相加或协同作用尚不能明确确定。在最后一次加强免疫9周后,通过直肠途径用10个50%感染剂量(MID50)的SHIV-BX08毒株对动物进行攻击。对猴子攻击后的随访包括检测对Gag和Env抗原的血清转化、通过与未感染的人类细胞共培养测量外周血单核细胞(PBMC)中的病毒感染性以及监测血浆病毒载量。通过PCR评估,没有一只动物免受感染,但无论接受何种疫苗方案接种的猕猴中均有三分之一(6/18)的动物与假对照相比,病毒血症峰值降低了200倍以上。有趣的是,在这六只受到保护的动物中,有四只没有发生血清转化。总之,这些结果清楚地表明,在包括Env或Gag等结构蛋白的多组分预防性疫苗中添加Tat和Rev等早期HIV蛋白可能对预防性疫苗策略有益。