• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管紧张素受体阻滞剂用于慢性心力衰竭患者的多中心临床试验:近期临床试验综述

[Multicenter clinical trial of angiotensin receptor blocker in patients with chronic heart failure: review of recent clinical trial].

作者信息

Ikeda Yasuhiro, Yamada Michio, Matsuzaki Masunori

机构信息

Department of Bioregulation, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine.

出版信息

Nihon Rinsho. 2002 Oct;60(10):2028-33.

PMID:12397702
Abstract

Angiotensin receptor blocker(ARB) is expected to be a substitute of ACE inhibitor for ACE inhibitor(ACEi) incompetent patient or an additive drug for the treatment of severe heart failure. Two large mega-trials(ELITE II & Val-HEFT) have been reported so far and one large trial(CHARM) is ongoing. In ELITE II study, there was no additional beneficial effects of ARB compared to ACEi(captopril). On the other hand, additive ARB may be beneficial for most of patients with heart failure, according to the Val-Heft trial. However, some adverse effects of ARB by the combinatory use with ACEi and beta-blocker should be taken into careful consideration. Ongoing CHARM trial may answer if ARB is ultimately useful for the treatment of heart failure.

摘要

血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)有望成为不能耐受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)患者的替代药物,或用于治疗重度心力衰竭的附加药物。目前已报道了两项大型试验(ELITE II和Val-HEFT),还有一项大型试验(CHARM)正在进行中。在ELITE II研究中,与ACEi(卡托普利)相比,ARB没有额外的有益作用。另一方面,根据Val-Heft试验,附加使用ARB可能对大多数心力衰竭患者有益。然而,应仔细考虑ARB与ACEi和β受体阻滞剂联合使用时的一些不良反应。正在进行的CHARM试验可能会回答ARB最终是否对心力衰竭治疗有用。

相似文献

1
[Multicenter clinical trial of angiotensin receptor blocker in patients with chronic heart failure: review of recent clinical trial].血管紧张素受体阻滞剂用于慢性心力衰竭患者的多中心临床试验:近期临床试验综述
Nihon Rinsho. 2002 Oct;60(10):2028-33.
2
Angiotensin II receptor antagonists and heart failure: angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors remain the first-line option.血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂与心力衰竭:血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂仍是一线选择。
Prescrire Int. 2005 Oct;14(79):180-6.
3
Meta-analyses of mortality and morbidity effects of an angiotensin receptor blocker in patients with chronic heart failure already receiving an ACE inhibitor (alone or with a beta-blocker).对已接受ACE抑制剂(单独使用或与β受体阻滞剂联用)的慢性心力衰竭患者使用血管紧张素受体阻滞剂的死亡率和发病率影响的荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2004 Feb;93(2-3):105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2003.10.001.
4
Blocking the renin-angiotensin system: dual- versus mono-therapy.阻断肾素-血管紧张素系统:双重治疗与单一治疗对比
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2009 Jun;7(6):667-74. doi: 10.1586/erc.09.47.
5
Clinical studies on the therapy of heart failure using ACE-inhibitors and AT1-receptor blockers--does combination treatment make sense?
Clin Nephrol. 2002 Jul;58 Suppl 1:S7-11.
6
[Adaptation of guidelines for the treatment of chronic heart failure in a specialized heart failure clinic].[在一家专业心力衰竭诊所对慢性心力衰竭治疗指南的调整]
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2002 Oct 31;114(19-20):833-9.
7
Inhibiting the renin-angiotensin system in myocardial infarction and heart failure: lessons from SAVE, VALIANT and CHARM, and other clinical trials.心肌梗死和心力衰竭中肾素-血管紧张素系统的抑制:来自SAVE、VALIANT和CHARM以及其他临床试验的经验教训。
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2006 Jul;21(4):268-72. doi: 10.1097/01.hco.0000231394.79609.24.
8
[ACE inhibitors and/or sartans in heart failure: is there a difference?].[心力衰竭中使用的血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和/或沙坦类药物:有区别吗?]
Rev Med Brux. 2003 Sep;24(4):A249-52.
9
Multinational economic evaluation of valsartan in patients with chronic heart failure: results from the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT).缬沙坦用于慢性心力衰竭患者的多国经济学评估:缬沙坦心力衰竭试验(Val-HeFT)的结果
Am Heart J. 2004 Jul;148(1):122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.12.040.
10
[Usefulness of ARB in heart failure].
Nihon Rinsho. 2009 Apr;67(4):751-7.