Suppr超能文献

日常实践中的法医学问题:每位从业者都必须了解的法律问题。

Forensic aspects of everyday practice: legal issues that every practitioner must know.

作者信息

Vernick Andrew E

机构信息

Wharton, Levin, Ehrmantraut & Klein, 104 West Street, Post Office Box 551, Annapolis, MD 21404-0551, USA.

出版信息

Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2002 Oct;11(4):905-28. doi: 10.1016/s1056-4993(02)00017-2.

Abstract

In their education and training, mental health care professionals are taught the intricacies and nuances of providing medical care to individuals with any and all psychological or psychiatric problems. This training, however, as comprehensive as it is from a medical perspective, does not and cannot prepare psychiatrists for the complex legal world that effectively has changed the manner and method in which mental health care is provided. As a result of the invasive meddling of the legal process into the mental health field, every patient is potentially a plaintiff in a lawsuit or a complainant in a licensure matter. The practitioner must navigate around the legal roadblocks without the benefit of a law degree. The questions as to who can provide consent, the adequacy of consent, the release of information, and the other issues set forth in this article only scratch the surface of the pervasive intertwining of the law with the mental health field. As most psychiatrists say in their parting advice to a patient, "call me if you have any problems," in this age of complex and potentially harmful interfacing between the psychiatric profession and the law, the psychiatrist must follow his or her own advice. When faced with an uncertainty as to the adequacy of consent, the release of information, or any legal issue, a psychiatrist must place a call to his or her insurer, health care attorney, or medical board to obtain guidance and direction. When there is a letter, a call, a subpoena, or almost anything other than a Christmas card from an attorney, the psychiatrist also should place a call to his or her insurer or health care attorney to ensure that he or she does not find himself or herself in Dr. Peters' position. Being accused before a licensure board or in a courtroom of failing to adequately obtain consent, failing to release information, or, conversely, releasing too much information is not a recommended mental health activity. Being in Dr. Peters' position and being accused of medical malpractice in which a patient has suffered emotional or physical damage or has committed suicide is also not a recommended activity for a psychiatrist. Although avoidance of attorneys and the legal process is not possible for the practitioner, with the proper information and legal resources, the child and adolescent psychiatrist can navigate around the legal potholes.

摘要

在心理健康护理专业人员的教育和培训中,他们学习了为有任何心理或精神问题的个人提供医疗护理的复杂性和细微差别。然而,从医学角度来看,这种培训尽管全面,但并没有也无法让精神科医生为这个实际上已经改变了心理健康护理提供方式和方法的复杂法律世界做好准备。由于法律程序对心理健康领域的侵入性干预,每个患者都有可能成为诉讼中的原告或执照相关事宜的投诉人。从业者必须在没有法律学位的情况下绕过法律障碍。本文中提出的关于谁能提供同意、同意的充分性、信息的披露以及其他问题,只是法律与心理健康领域普遍交织的表面现象。正如大多数精神科医生在给患者的临别建议中所说:“如果你有任何问题,给我打电话。”在精神科专业与法律之间存在复杂且可能有害的相互作用的这个时代,精神科医生必须遵循自己的建议。当面对关于同意的充分性、信息的披露或任何法律问题的不确定性时,精神科医生必须打电话给其保险公司、医疗保健律师或医学委员会以获取指导和方向。当收到律师的信件、电话、传票或几乎任何不是圣诞卡的东西时,精神科医生也应该打电话给其保险公司或医疗保健律师,以确保自己不会陷入彼得斯医生的境地。在执照委员会面前或法庭上被指控未能充分获得同意、未能披露信息,或者相反,披露了过多信息,这可不是推荐的心理健康活动。处于彼得斯医生的境地并被指控医疗过失,导致患者遭受情感或身体伤害或自杀,这对精神科医生来说也不是推荐的活动。尽管从业者不可能避开律师和法律程序,但有了适当的信息和法律资源,儿童和青少年精神科医生可以绕过法律陷阱。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验