• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童和青少年法医评估实践参数。

Practice parameter for child and adolescent forensic evaluations.

出版信息

J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;50(12):1299-312. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.09.020.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaac.2011.09.020
PMID:22115153
Abstract

This Parameter addresses the key concepts that differentiate the forensic evaluation of children and adolescents from a clinical assessment. There are ethical issues unique to the forensic evaluation, because the forensic evaluator's duty is to the person, court, or agency requesting the evaluation, rather than to the patient. The forensic evaluator clarifies the legal questions to be answered and structures the evaluation to address those issues. The forensic examination may include a review of collateral information, interviews and other assessments of the child or adolescent, and interviews with other relevant informants. The principles in this Parameter suggest the general approach to the forensic evaluation of children and adolescents and are relevant to delinquency, child custody, child maltreatment, personal injury, and other court-ordered and noncourt-ordered evaluations.

摘要

本参数涉及将儿童和青少年的法医评估与临床评估区分开来的关键概念。法医评估有其独特的伦理问题,因为法医评估员的职责是为请求评估的个人、法庭或机构服务,而不是为患者服务。法医评估员澄清需要回答的法律问题,并构建评估以解决这些问题。法医检查可能包括对旁证信息的审查、对儿童或青少年的访谈和其他评估,以及对其他相关知情者的访谈。本参数中的原则表明了对儿童和青少年进行法医评估的一般方法,与青少年犯罪、儿童监护权、儿童虐待、人身伤害以及其他法庭命令和非法庭命令评估有关。

相似文献

1
Practice parameter for child and adolescent forensic evaluations.儿童和青少年法医评估实践参数。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;50(12):1299-312. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.09.020.
2
Ethical issues in forensic child and adolescent psychiatry.儿童及青少年法医精神病学中的伦理问题。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1992 May;31(3):403-7. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199205000-00004.
3
The treatment-forensic interface.治疗与法医的交叉领域
J Psychiatr Pract. 2008 Mar;14(2):122-5. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000314320.25286.bf.
4
Forensic psychiatry.法医精神病学
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2011 Jul;20(3):xv-xvii. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2011.03.014. Epub 2011 Apr 3.
5
Ethics and the clinician in custody disputes.伦理与监护权纠纷中的临床医生
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 1998 Apr;7(2):455-63, ix.
6
Forensic issues.法医问题。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1991 Jul;30(4):692-3. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199107000-00026.
7
Teleconferencing model for forensic consultation, court testimony, and continuing education.用于法医咨询、法庭证词和继续教育的电话会议模式。
Behav Sci Law. 2008;26(3):301-13. doi: 10.1002/bsl.809.
8
Psychiatry and the death penalty.精神病学与死刑
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2006 Sep;29(3):791-804. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2006.04.002.
9
[On the work of Austrian authorised experts on procedures in custodial and visiting rights--a survey of current practice from the parents and children view].[关于奥地利监护权和探视权程序方面的授权专家工作——从父母和子女视角对当前实践的调查]
Neuropsychiatr. 2008;22(4):268-76.
10
Patient warnings in court-ordered evaluations of children and families.法庭下令对儿童和家庭进行评估时的患者警示。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1987;15(3):283-300.

引用本文的文献

1
Divergent interpretations of child abuse in legal judgments: perspectives from clinicians and forensic experts.法律判决中对虐待儿童的不同解读:临床医生和法医专家的观点
Arch Public Health. 2024 Oct 25;82(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01425-y.
2
An Argument for Expanding the Role of Pediatric Decision-Making and Preference in Child Abuse/Neglect Assessments and Plan.关于扩大儿童决策和偏好在虐待/忽视儿童评估及计划中的作用的论证。
Case Rep Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 18;2021:9910304. doi: 10.1155/2021/9910304. eCollection 2021.
3
Custody Evaluation Process and Report Writing.
监护权评估流程与报告撰写
Soa Chongsonyon Chongsin Uihak. 2020 Apr 1;31(2):58-65. doi: 10.5765/jkacap.200006.
4
The Concept and Historical Background of Custody Evaluation.监护权评估的概念与历史背景
Soa Chongsonyon Chongsin Uihak. 2020 Apr 1;31(2):53-57. doi: 10.5765/jkacap.200005.
5
Nature, Nurture, and Attachment: Implications in Light of Expanding Definitions of Parenthood.自然、教养与依恋:基于扩展的父母身份定义的启示。
Psychiatr Q. 2018 Sep;89(3):511-519. doi: 10.1007/s11126-017-9554-3.
6
Mental Health and Law - Contemporary issues.心理健康与法律——当代问题
Indian J Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;58(Suppl 2):S166-S167. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.196802.
7
Three models of child abuse consultations: A qualitative study of inpatient child abuse consultation notes.儿童虐待会诊的三种模式:对住院儿童虐待会诊记录的定性研究
Child Abuse Negl. 2015 May;43:53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.11.009. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
8
Evaluation and treatment of childhood physical abuse and neglect: a review.儿童身体虐待和忽视的评估与治疗:综述
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2014 Jan;16(1):429. doi: 10.1007/s11920-013-0429-5.