Töyräs J, Nieminen M T, Kröger H, Jurvelin J S
Department of Applied Physics, University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland.
Bone. 2002 Oct;31(4):503-7. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(02)00843-8.
Measurement of areal bone mineral density (BMD(areal)), broadband ultrasound (US) attenuation (BUA), and speed-of-sound (SOS) are widely used ways to perform clinical assessment of bone quality. In this study, bovine (n = 37) and human (n = 32) trabecular bone was investigated in vitro and in vivo to reveal relationships between mechanical properties, mineral density, and US parameters BUA and SOS. To fulfill these aims, clinical US and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) techniques, as well as dynamic and destructive mechanical testing, were utilized. BUA correlated positively and linearly with BMD(areal) only in human calcaneus of low or moderate density (r = 0.849, n = 32, p < 0.01). When calcaneal areas with high BMD(areal) were included in the analysis, however, the in vivo study revealed that the BUA-BMD(areal) relationship could be described by a second-order polynomial fit (r(2) = 0.618, n = 408). In high-density human or bovine bone, the BUA-bone density relationship was negative. In the in vitro assessment, BUA correlated linearly and negatively with volumetric BMD (BMD(vol)) (r = -0.540, n = 29, p < 0.01) and with storage modulus, as measured at 1 Hz (r = -0.505, n = 28, p < 0.01). A weak positive correlation was found between BUA and mechanical loss tangent (r = 0.322, n = 28, p < 0.1). SOS correlated strongly positively with BMD(vol) (r = 0.888, n = 29, p < 0.01), as well with storage modulus (r = 0.649, n = 28, p < 0.01). In contrast, SOS correlated negatively with loss tangent (r = -0.417, n = 28, p < 0.05). When tested dynamically in the frequency range of 0.01-22.7 Hz, bovine trabecular bone was only slightly viscoelastic. In summary, the most accurate parameters for measuring storage modulus and strength of bovine trabecular bone were SOS and BMD(vol), respectively. BUA failed to predict the mechanical properties of high-density trabecular bone. In vivo mapping of the calcaneus revealed the importance of standardized and reproducible localization of the measurement site for the validity of BUA values.
测量面骨矿物质密度(BMD(areal))、宽带超声(US)衰减(BUA)和声速(SOS)是临床上广泛用于评估骨质量的方法。在本研究中,对牛(n = 37)和人(n = 32)的小梁骨进行了体外和体内研究,以揭示力学性能、矿物质密度与超声参数BUA和SOS之间的关系。为实现这些目标,采用了临床超声和双能X线吸收法(DXA)技术,以及动态和破坏性力学测试。仅在低密度或中度密度的人跟骨中,BUA与BMD(areal)呈正线性相关(r = 0.849,n = 32,p < 0.01)。然而,当分析中纳入高BMD(areal)的跟骨区域时,体内研究表明,BUA - BMD(areal)关系可用二阶多项式拟合来描述(r(2) = 0.618,n = 408)。在高密度的人或牛骨中,BUA与骨密度的关系为负。在体外评估中,BUA与体积骨密度(BMD(vol))呈线性负相关(r = -0.540,n = 29,p < 0.01),与在1 Hz下测量的储能模量呈负相关(r = -0.505,n = 28,p < 0.01)。在BUA与力学损耗角正切之间发现了弱正相关(r = 0.322,n = 28,p < 0.1)。SOS与BMD(vol)呈强正相关(r = 0.888,n = 29,p < 0.01),也与储能模量呈正相关(r = 0.649,n = 28,p < 0.01)。相反,SOS与损耗角正切呈负相关(r = -0.417,n = 28,p < 0.05)。当在0.01 - 22.7 Hz频率范围内进行动态测试时,牛小梁骨仅具有轻微的粘弹性。总之,测量牛小梁骨储能模量和强度的最准确参数分别是SOS和BMD(vol)。BUA无法预测高密度小梁骨的力学性能。跟骨的体内映射显示了测量部位标准化和可重复定位对于BUA值有效性的重要性。