Hermiz Oshana, Comino Elizabeth, Marks Guy, Daffurn Kathy, Wilson Stephen, Harris Mark
School of Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia.
BMJ. 2002 Oct 26;325(7370):938. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7370.938.
To evaluate usefulness of limited community based care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease after discharge from hospital.
Randomised controlled trial.
Liverpool Health Service and Macarthur Health Service in outer metropolitan Sydney between September 1999 and July 2000.
177 patients randomised into an intervention group (84 patients) and a control group (93 patients) which received current usual care.
Home visits by community nurse at one and four weeks after discharge and preventive general practitioner care.
Frequency of patients' presentation and admission to hospital; changes in patients' disease-specific quality of life, measured with St George's respiratory questionnaire, over three months after discharge; patients' knowledge of illness, self management, and satisfaction with care at discharge and three months later; frequency of general practitioner and nurse visits and their satisfaction with care.
Intervention and control groups showed no differences in presentation or admission to hospital or in overall functional status. However, the intervention group improved their activity scores and the control group worsened their symptom scores. While intervention group patients received more visits from community nurses and were more satisfied with their care, involvement of general practitioners was much less (with only 31% (22) remembering receiving a care plan). Patients in the intervention group had higher knowledge scores and were more satisfied. There were no differences in general practitioner visits or management.
This brief intervention after acute care improved patients' knowledge and some aspects of quality of life. However, it failed to prevent presentation and readmission to hospital.
评估出院后针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者开展有限的社区护理的效用。
随机对照试验。
1999年9月至2000年7月间,悉尼大都市外围的利物浦卫生服务机构和麦考瑞卫生服务机构。
177名患者被随机分为干预组(84名患者)和接受现行常规护理的对照组(93名患者)。
出院后1周和4周时社区护士进行家访以及预防性全科医生护理。
患者就诊和住院的频率;出院后三个月内,采用圣乔治呼吸问卷测量的患者特定疾病生活质量的变化;患者对疾病的认知、自我管理情况,以及出院时和三个月后的护理满意度;全科医生和护士家访的频率以及他们对护理的满意度。
干预组和对照组在就诊或住院情况以及整体功能状态方面无差异。然而,干预组的活动评分有所改善,而对照组的症状评分则有所恶化。虽然干预组患者接受社区护士家访的次数更多,对护理的满意度也更高,但全科医生的参与度要低得多(只有31%(22人)记得收到过护理计划)。干预组患者的知识得分更高,满意度也更高。在全科医生家访或管理方面没有差异。
急性护理后的这种简短干预提高了患者的知识水平和生活质量的某些方面。然而,它未能预防患者就诊和再次入院。