• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物假体与机械主动脉瓣置换术同期冠状动脉旁路移植术的结果。

Results of bioprosthetic versus mechanical aortic valve replacement performed with concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting.

作者信息

Akins Cary W, Hilgenberg Alan D, Vlahakes Gus J, MacGillivray Thomas E, Torchiana David F, Madsen Joren C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114, USA.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Oct;74(4):1098-106. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03840-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03840-7
PMID:12400752
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Concomitant coronary artery disease with aortic valve disease is an established risk factor for diminished late survival. This study evaluated the results of bioprosthetic (BAVR) or mechanical aortic valve replacement (MAVR) performed with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

From January 1984 through July 1997, combined AVR + CABG was performed in 750 consecutive patients; 469 received BAVR and 281 received MAVR. BAVR recipients were significantly older (mean age, 75 vs 65 years), and had more nonelective operations, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, preoperative intraaortic balloons, lower cardiac indices, more severe aortic stenosis, less aortic regurgitation, and more extensive coronary artery disease.

RESULTS

Early complications included operative mortality, 32 patients (4.3% total: 3.8% BAVR and 5.0% MAVR); perioperative infarction, 10 (1.3%); and perioperative stroke, 22 (2.9%). Significant multivariable predictors of early mortality were age, perioperative infarction or stroke, nonelective operation, operative year, ventricular hypertrophy, and need for intraaortic balloon. Ten-year actuarial survival was 41.7% for all patients. Predicted survival for age- and gender-matched cohorts from the general population versus observed survival were BAVR, 45% versus 36%; MAVR, 71% versus 48% (survival differences BAVR 9% vs MAVR 23%, p < 0.007). Significant multivariable predictors of late mortality included age, congestive failure, perioperative stroke, extent of coronary disease, peripheral vascular disease, and diabetes. Valve type was not significant. Ten-year actuarial freedom from valve-related complications were (BAVR vs MAVR) structural deterioration, 95% versus 100%, p = NS; thromboembolism, 86% versus 84%, p = NS; anticoagulant bleeding, 93% versus 88%, p < 0.005; reoperation, 98% versus 98%, p = NS.

CONCLUSIONS

AVR + CABG has diminished late survival despite the type of prosthesis inserted. Although valve type did not predict late mortality, mechanical AVR was associated with worse survival compared with predicted and more valve-related complications due to anticoagulation requirements.

摘要

背景

冠心病合并主动脉瓣疾病是晚期生存率降低的既定危险因素。本研究评估了冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)联合生物瓣主动脉瓣置换术(BAVR)或机械瓣主动脉瓣置换术(MAVR)的结果。

方法

从1984年1月至1997年7月,连续750例患者接受了AVR + CABG联合手术;469例接受BAVR,281例接受MAVR。接受BAVR的患者年龄显著更大(平均年龄75岁对65岁),非择期手术更多,存在充血性心力衰竭、外周血管疾病,术前使用主动脉内球囊,心脏指数更低,主动脉狭窄更严重,主动脉反流更少,冠状动脉疾病更广泛。

结果

早期并发症包括手术死亡率,32例患者(总计4.3%:BAVR为3.8%,MAVR为5.0%);围手术期心肌梗死,10例(1.3%);围手术期卒中,22例(2.9%)。早期死亡的显著多变量预测因素为年龄、围手术期心肌梗死或卒中、非择期手术、手术年份、心室肥厚以及是否需要主动脉内球囊。所有患者的10年精算生存率为41.7%。与普通人群年龄和性别匹配队列的预测生存率相比,观察到的生存率为:BAVR,45%对36%;MAVR,71%对48%(生存率差异BAVR为9%对MAVR为23%,p < 0.007)。晚期死亡的显著多变量预测因素包括年龄、充血性心力衰竭、围手术期卒中、冠状动脉疾病范围、外周血管疾病和糖尿病。瓣膜类型不显著。10年无瓣膜相关并发症的精算自由度为(BAVR对MAVR):结构恶化,95%对100%,p = 无显著性差异;血栓栓塞,86%对84%,p = 无显著性差异;抗凝相关出血,93%对88%,p < 0.005;再次手术,98%对98%,p = 无显著性差异。

结论

尽管植入的假体类型不同,AVR + CABG的晚期生存率仍有所降低。虽然瓣膜类型不能预测晚期死亡率,但与预测生存率相比,机械瓣AVR的生存率更差,且由于抗凝需求,与瓣膜相关的并发症更多。

相似文献

1
Results of bioprosthetic versus mechanical aortic valve replacement performed with concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting.生物假体与机械主动脉瓣置换术同期冠状动脉旁路移植术的结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Oct;74(4):1098-106. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03840-7.
2
Hospital readmission rates are similar between patients with mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valves.机械主动脉瓣患者和生物人工主动脉瓣患者的医院再入院率相似。
J Card Surg. 2018 Sep;33(9):497-505. doi: 10.1111/jocs.13781. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
3
Mechanical Versus Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 50 Years and Younger.50 岁及以下患者的机械瓣与生物瓣主动脉瓣置换术。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Oct;106(4):1113-1120. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.05.073. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
4
Previous coronary artery bypass grafting is not a risk factor for aortic valve replacement.既往冠状动脉旁路移植术并非主动脉瓣置换术的危险因素。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 Sep;64(3):651-7; discussion 657-8. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00622-x.
5
Contemporary trends and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical and bioprosthetic surgical aortic valve replacement in the United States.美国机械瓣和生物瓣主动脉瓣置换术的当代趋势和院内结局。
J Card Surg. 2022 Jul;37(7):1980-1988. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16499. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
6
Safety of remote aortic valve replacement after prior coronary artery bypass grafting.既往冠状动脉旁路移植术后行远程主动脉瓣置换术的安全性。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Jun;61(6):1689-91; discussion 1691-2. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(96)00165-8.
7
Results of concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting in the VA population.退伍军人事务部人群中同期主动脉瓣置换术和冠状动脉旁路移植术的结果。
J Heart Valve Dis. 2006 Jan;15(1):12-8; discussion 18-9.
8
Surgical management of aortic valve disease in the elderly: A retrospective comparative study of valve choice using propensity score analysis.老年人主动脉瓣疾病的外科治疗:一项使用倾向评分分析进行瓣膜选择的回顾性比较研究。
J Heart Valve Dis. 2008 Jul;17(4):355-64; discussion 365.
9
Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Severe Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Stenosis Undergoing Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.严重生物瓣主动脉瓣狭窄患者再次行主动脉瓣置换术的特点和结局。
Circulation. 2015 Nov 24;132(21):1953-60. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.015939. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
10
The prognostic impact of concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting during aortic valve surgery: implications for revascularization in the transcatheter era.同期行冠状动脉旁路移植术对主动脉瓣手术预后的影响:经导管时代再血管化的意义。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Feb;149(2):451-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.08.073. Epub 2014 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in <50 Years Old Patients - Where is the Evidence?50岁以下患者的生物人工主动脉瓣置换术——证据何在?
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Dec 1;34(6):729-738. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0374.
2
Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the utilization and in-hospital outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement in Spain (2001-2015).西班牙 2 型糖尿病对主动脉瓣置换术的利用和院内结局的影响(2001-2015 年)。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018 Oct 16;17(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0780-2.
3
Calcification and Oxidative Modifications Are Associated With Progressive Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Dysfunction.
钙化和氧化修饰与生物人工心脏瓣膜功能的进行性障碍相关。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 May 8;6(5):e005648. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005648.
4
Contemporary outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement with bioprostheses and allografts: a systematic review and meta-analysis.生物假体和同种异体移植物主动脉瓣置换术后的当代结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Oct;50(4):605-616. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw101. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
5
Performance of EuroSCORE II compared to EuroSCORE I in predicting operative and mid-term mortality of patients from a single center after combined coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic valve replacement.在单一中心,比较欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)与欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统I(EuroSCORE I)预测冠状动脉旁路移植术和主动脉瓣置换术联合患者手术及中期死亡率的性能。
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Feb;62(2):103-11. doi: 10.1007/s11748-013-0311-8. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
6
Analysis of mitral valve replacement outcomes is enhanced by meaningful clinical use of electronic health records.通过对电子健康记录进行有意义的临床应用,二尖瓣置换术结果的分析得以加强。
Perm J. 2013 Spring;17(2):12-6. doi: 10.7812/TPP/12-113.
7
Coronary artery bypass grafting associated to aortic valve replacement in the elderly: survival and quality of life.老年人冠状动脉旁路移植术联合主动脉瓣置换术:生存率和生活质量
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Feb 6;7:13. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-7-13.
8
Mid term outcome and quality of life after aortic valve replacement in elderly people: mechanical versus stentless biological valves.老年人主动脉瓣置换术后的中期结局及生活质量:机械瓣膜与无支架生物瓣膜的比较
Heart. 2005 Aug;91(8):1023-9. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.036178.
9
When is concomitant aortic valve replacement indicated in patients with mild to moderate stenosis undergoing coronary revascularization?对于轻至中度狭窄且正在接受冠状动脉血运重建的患者,何时适合同期进行主动脉瓣置换?
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2005 Mar;7(2):101-4. doi: 10.1007/s11886-005-0020-8.