Barberis Daniela S
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin.
J Hist Behav Sci. 2002 Fall;38(4):355-69. doi: 10.1002/jhbs.10080.
In this article, I address the issues at stake in the relationship between sociology and philosophy in the second half of the nineteenth century by focusing on a debate between two parties: Emile Durkheim, who was attempting to found an independent scientific sociology, and the editors and collaborators of the Revue de métaphysique et de morale (RMM), one of the central philosophical journals of the period. This debate focused on the role of philosophy in secondary school education, but at its heart, this was a struggle between two disciplines over which ought to direct the formation of good citizens for Third Republic France.
在本文中,我通过聚焦于两个阵营之间的一场辩论,来探讨19世纪下半叶社会学与哲学关系中所涉及的关键问题:一方是试图创立一门独立科学社会学的埃米尔·涂尔干,另一方是当时核心哲学刊物之一《形而上学与道德评论》(RMM)的编辑及撰稿人。这场辩论聚焦于哲学在中学教育中的作用,但究其实质,这是两门学科之间的一场较量,关乎哪门学科应该指导为法兰西第三共和国培养优秀公民。